Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by h2774747.stratoserver.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTP id w5LKOmjc029338 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:24:50 +0200 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.119.212]) by mx-ha.gmx.net (mxgmx115 [212.227.17.5]) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 1MEn6B-1fQMqW1uUV-00GBN6 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:24:43 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5LKOgXc013000; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:24:43 +0200 Received: from listserv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804DA127947; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:24:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 27383334 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:24:42 +0200 Delivered-To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688871278E9 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:24:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [208.118.235.92]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w5LKOafn012969 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:24:39 +0200 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fW688-0004XJ-EL for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:24:35 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fW688-0004XF-AG for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:24:32 -0400 Received: from x5ce4c1e3.dyn.telefonica.de ([92.228.193.227]:33004 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fW687-0007EQ-Rk for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:24:32 -0400 References: <941aad2c-bc3d-ca7a-1757-470e7ed1d5b9@free.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e Message-ID: <87bmc3ripu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:24:29 +0200 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: Package registration To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <941aad2c-bc3d-ca7a-1757-470e7ed1d5b9@free.fr> (Julien RIVAUD's message of "Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:10:14 +0200") Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: Envelope-To: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=V3; X-UI-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:8pSTti95pho=:evmN2+IJD+BTKcc2aIEgdNelOn Wg90nYWo52SxW+p/oK8GeL9y4nk89ZkuELM65LtltS+SequQSJh6sERfCyygll3763wh+1VZB b/FHfd5bk2Pu3PwM8R6h5Vxlhk1hcL+xKNjhBuy53BucDIpbVD0AmwERQMGYRgehcbhLcVfFN Ptsp+v29j+1f5U+A8UaWrhN+z7IjoyCN3QTrJBScfiYq8iY0XzM77t6VaUwyomESTu9khekzG X6hjHDcK+JyA1WVjX0XBU4aUlayuOoW97GIoxTi3JSn149rsWThUqsMVbmb0f4qRX60DK2NxZ WrqFtoCRfACYgQgILYZWxwtCcTjZW5A9h+HoyQHWzZ+00I9UpK9fNdBPvsLbkn/TYUBQrXfJm Djlb/3V9R8i0yUgZmNGwWxXncuYiVqBjJDfTAVYRHZtnfuOMm3nOwtOrg26OGJ1fq9+CfVfWD hOkrQqpeAsGWzkI+ET5wZaoKVr3Z8HTyKZH1iy/EEV8Nq1Ct4hBy+YahsV4cYIj8fVRBDB9cw /ocBbnFH3sv8im/HKiv7VxHKXTEOGufdMpMFQerJ06f6qC2rgOVInVHYlI9FZOLfXRGrL8KPY N2X2vtvOHm9TL/J7nsCMLwJrziJNLf9gOgkp0BriqYGu020G7wwWJx46+oY2pj6ReFrbEd/aS qucLcYk3iypbHRb+uMLSFc+7NzpQH0kUk11O2yohC+tTa5JOgViRaAznPB8UJqAqJH1pEEY7t Kk+c9EA5u4KVGwJC/kwMU2j6jW5JXTr9j7cotTPi+MZJ38hlUAep6kH3LqcIyry7AFVHzJ+lU Z57BBHq2CGdhpvaKKVjvgR8jP57Vlb8JAOmopigWN5/iOe1vjFC598h0emTwc9ol1VHPGcUCr DIZ/MyyGNXDbBk3QrTB5xBKdQhS5WkuYmalrLB4Dm6yDgbgL3EMChGzglay9kDVCUJmM9cDRs YU8zal/39MRH1kmJ6kpc13xK7mCn8ch02HTTGoVPxP0Gz94Fy0aGlwYdfcOVR0wZOSLQQncct Aob8TH5WxwuSj5StUG6gP8SXww3HE2fd7l+ilQSNW0Bg9mTqdKbMKmt2pHTePPIYCh8eG7g8v KWd8nih3UbBlDGLKSzAN7ULPQf/NL344LHtk48LDPMtHoI2tcNK2FADHjdGrxiKfXG3ZqhydX iFxMO1z2dFakSBK5djZ+xCkvEf2h3a6rTRFUtDipp2S+dRIDks27cISRiBeg1DpcdO7xN4PO8 Ub/SnbHjTjlsH1Ff/E4w+GXNpGlzUuqX2FRCHBztC8EGFrYjflVczvZHVqX0TcpjqBImX8/mn gH/+NjYpAnP2s8Ielf5TF6uaGvPorGtyWkb9df9AbLUbSggRPGoe8H4TOnq/YW7ZCh1WmvVVS Wc4S6YgMpbNusqjxY10ChS7YgFVCzqFrcS3rEdlwIdpGVjWSUUn9kVhh6GFUG7Y96IdTcDXNl W4PdVHDooLMMZjDcXB56Qfj3mkzyYnofC9+k3O39552MsoFKZl8ZBT+XsK5f9AZ7e9lG3yw5K 1eXwEPhNg8r6qCgkn+bnhpxnvy5Y8pncXyE/e4VtuofWBBHElB1PMeGGI/qNQJ4ijXTukAQie bDsTer24mZlMqIlccXk2gHm6GoPn3k+skF7U+vaq3wwne8xFzm7lHbNKJ2+idyzqWDdUfse/F lX86U/QNm4TtHC5sIQa895ErMnTGdvr2HOk55D7fhZYQ/gs+lMtkSwOfR9PF6NsFSc2Osg/ah J1CWnSDFn3hv1hkVu775Sw7UqTXvNEToI4RGPDIf4M64GSATgLN/s69nFlmGH0TU+NLlY8x7q J43R+W+Tt9MWeJSxuKKka1wnaC5Usqzs+DTNI7C8D1ApUIEU90VZDMO8L/RQb0lX18Lgrzvto hOom4v8o7FyiGsNrQ/QNuDIOtqaLS8KIlehrFrV6q4iVg0bY8pT9oQWGB3o5 X-UI-Loop:V01:7T03vt1FUFk=:nfrryXhHfb/nDmMzWpC0kB9J03wup8Ajjt4mKrCuBpg= X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Ec3e1RneIIs=:O3Y7Pw+HgHjnmXIf3MHw3w 0puEK7WDpBsi9yQngAUVuA3EEevSRczhPsXHxbTMSlPUDjZHGzvlzrtT6hIgMIeX7pizTYbo0 x8V76cslmNeo/zGbElyIbv/HujbYfaDEJ59ZbMrkEHtmvxykh18eNJKXR2oG2GpApWnEmacJK AlI8R/t+VU2DVNyGTGww9d+/UaAJI26m140EvfvdwZYSi+PQGrMZEm8r4p6HIR0MJWdlOzgGi h0YM46oYb3Y7YmErlHHzgGEw1bNaCwHAIRZjFUoX4KbhCXqd/IJL9cXGYKqohmvRd6lG5yUrF Hwdl4UJRKUiImvhKuLu6YLgPeKHEjvABD7apFuI6caN8NQE3RdHIhDdQN4NKGoS+xj0V6+stU iPpuD4vR1kPaDDaLPUTPWaFGlqQPjIORSHGEQQex+bTCYNyyd0SDnhON7rh0VOQ8mnYMQWg6r S96rv825iG8jSkBGJk0kpItrWNLF5f4= X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 81.169.212.23 Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8052 "Julien RIVAUD (_FrnchFrgg_)" writes: > Hello, > > I would like to register the |statistics| prefix, if possible. A stupid question that just occured to me: should we be discouraging registering prefixes that match another prefix' contribution to the overly simplistic hash function used in almost all TeX engines? The purpose of hash prefixes is to make packages independent from one another even if there would be overlap without prefix, and at least regarding hash buckets and thus performance, an identical prefix hash would imply packages impacting one another where names overlap. -- David Kastrup