References: <20160226093326.GB526@hzdr.de>
            <56D03685.2060903@morningstar2.co.uk> <5vuczhq0w7tm.dlg@nililand.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
            Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID:  <56D03C1D.2050807@morningstar2.co.uk>
Date:         Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:50:53 +0000
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: Joseph Wright <joseph.wright@MORNINGSTAR2.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Fwd: new prefixes
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <5vuczhq0w7tm.dlg@nililand.de>
Precedence: list
Envelope-To: <rainer.schoepf@GMX.NET>
Status: R

On 26/02/2016 11:37, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> Am Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:27:01 +0000 schrieb Joseph Wright:
> 
>> New prefixes registered as detailed below.
> 
> which triggered me to look at the list.
> https://github.com/latex3/latex3/blob/master/l3kernel/l3prefixes.csv
> 
> And imho in my case the order is wrong (the prefix is UF and the
> package citeall). Also my name is not written correctly. 

Correct, though looking at the code the prefix is "UFca" (which is what
I've put).

> It also reminds me of a question: Is there a prefix pattern which
> will never be registered so that one can safely use it in
> local/private definitions?

We can only *ask* we can't *tell*, but I'd probably strongly discourage
"foo", "tmp", "local", "mypkg" and similar 'throw away' prefixes. I'll
see if the team feel we should register a prefix specifically for this
purpose ('Local additions not to be distributed').

Joseph