Lines: 16
References: <CAMVYejDKyWdZ1QpjKGKTHhw-wV5pQi2EQV_OzBqAF9Fgxa1uqQ@mail.gmail.com> <8t4qihf0fz0p.dlg@nililand.de>
            <562E282A.3040205@morningstar2.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.41de
Message-ID:  <1we8whvcpqno8$.dlg@nililand.de>
Date:         Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:44:30 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: Ulrike Fischer <news3@NILILAND.DE>
Subject: Re: Spaces in l3keys keys
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Precedence: list
Envelope-To: <rainer.schoepf@GMX.NET>
Status: R

Am Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:18:34 +0000 schrieb Joseph Wright:

>> You naturally loose potential key names. And there is the danger
>> that there is somewhere a package which relies on the current
>> implementation. 
> 
> I assume you mean that some package might be relying on the spaces in
> some way (so two keys differing only in a space in the name).

Yes. Not that it would be a good idea to have two such keys and I
don't think that it is very probable. 


-- 
Ulrike Fischer 
http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/