Received: from comedy.dante.de (comedy.dante.de [176.28.54.184]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2ubuntu2.1) with ESMTP id t22DESsV007744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:14:28 +0100 Received: from comedy.dante.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comedy.dante.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id t22DDpbf032212; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:13:54 +0100 Received: from smtp3.easily.co.uk (smtp3.easily.co.uk [91.194.151.18]) by comedy.dante.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id t22DDlSx032203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:13:48 +0100 Received: from [131.111.184.86] (port=36849 helo=palladium.local) by smtp3.easily.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1YSQAN-0000N3-2V; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 13:13:47 +0000 Message-ID: <54F4620A.9060803@morningstar2.co.uk> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 13:13:46 +0000 From: Joseph Wright User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Carlisle Subject: Re: LaTeX2e Update 2015 problem References: <1o9mof44i4wtd$.dlg@nililand.de> <54F38900.7070208@morningstar2.co.uk> <54F39162.2040608@morningstar2.co.uk> <54F3928C.2020707@morningstar2.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-DANTE-Spam-Score: -1.9 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 85.214.41.38 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 176.28.54.184 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 176.28.54.184 Cc: LaTeX Team X-BeenThere: latex-team@latex-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: latex-team-bounces@latex-project.org Sender: "Latex-team" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7668 On 01/03/2015 22:51, David Carlisle wrote: > I'm wondering if after all we should "suggest" an update to etex.sty > that doesn't over-write the allocation system on new formats. If (as > in this case) etex.sty is loaded late after the new allocation scheme > has already allocated into the extended range, the etex scheme won't > look in count11-19 to see where to pick up the extended range it will > always start allocating from 271 so you will get double allocations. > It would be possible to fix that echoing the allocation numbers into > the etex counts > but that adds a lot of complication for what should be a temporary problem. > > I think having etex.sty detect 2015 and not trample on the new > allocation scheme (but define > stubs for \resereinserts and \globcount etc may work better, despite > having argues against that earlier. Updating etex.sty is fine but I don't think that the cost can be disabling \loccount, etc. That's a fundamental part of etex.sty and more importantly having it perhaps work one way and perhaps another (depending on kernel version) seems like a very bad idea. Joseph _______________________________________________ Latex-team mailing list Latex-team@latex-project.org https://lists.dante.de/mailman/listinfo/latex-team