Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2ubuntu2.1) with ESMTP id t08DscTx001860 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:54:39 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by mx-ha.gmx.net (mxgmx112) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0M7kbs-1Xvy2p1d56-00vSCt for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:54:31 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t08DpicA028843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:51:44 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t08DSNlI008598; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:51:44 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 11519893 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:51:44 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t08DpiDa011428 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:51:44 +0100 Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db3on0102.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.55.234.102]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t08Dowb3002514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:51:01 +0100 Received: from [192.156.217.146] (62.254.111.82) by AMSPR05MB360.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.224.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.49.12; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:50:57 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <180s5on6su3rq.dlg@nililand.de> <54AE65F2.4030804@morningstar2.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [62.254.111.82] X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPR02CA0051.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.242.225.179) To AMSPR05MB360.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.224.26) X-DmarcAction: None X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005003);SRVR:AMSPR05MB360; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004);SRVR:AMSPR05MB360; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0450A714CB X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(6049001)(189002)(199003)(101416001)(40100003)(99396003)(80316001)(4396001)(122386002)(105586002)(65816999)(76176999)(87266999)(54356999)(65806001)(64126003)(74826001)(50466002)(65956001)(66066001)(83506001)(120916001)(107886001)(59896002)(106356001)(50986999)(87976001)(107046002)(64706001)(21056001)(47776003)(20776003)(31966008)(97736003)(2950100001)(42186005)(33656002)(77096005)(36756003)(62966003)(92566001)(77156002)(450100001)(46102003)(74482002)(68736005);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:AMSPR05MB360;H:[192.156.217.146];FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: nag.co.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AMSPR05MB360; X-OriginatorOrg: nag.co.uk X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2015 13:50:57.5171 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AMSPR05MB360 Message-ID: <54AE8B3F.2000600@nag.co.uk> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:50:55 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: David Carlisle Subject: Re: fix-cm and optical sizes To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <54AE65F2.4030804@morningstar2.co.uk> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: Envelope-To: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=V3; X-GMX-Antivirus: 0 (no virus found) X-UI-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:E6j5BBKPe+Y=:+oeMrGnKUIVikzL0HyfTNvKK4z SgSgDBwIedAXJlZNJ5KnIN8u05ps4COvI7MEmP6hXMDjO8z/zVDBhPnfsfbFv/qDb0WO7z3Ov XYaDAf28lh1lSSGt3ScGyyuKnlRQSdXWZxOV0rQT11XV/SEkVuT1nJKv9scFV4A5MaX0IlEAs 7dOO675K5b1vbUba+INEZsxgNZJihRmoMg2XJa/VxQO7Oq9Y2Kb8LuaMBtTbyw9Oq4A8ckGPS 0fVOMHajzXGrATtj55V7+iN2+eN7gkXAHK/1DhrwjgPYXcCsvxfUOqDFfAo+yqErUkIPk8p/q X45aDWMHYVLcMA6Si67VNVUJbSp0E/G0No8KGUeUWXlxnRDugHNlA3SMSGF5cWsa+bTcwtwCy REctzpNqv4fEskSQ+klK34psJgLy/QjkBM23bynAAihLqH6LspvcDsD0CG0WyjFy0CVxghgky EC1sbD4pRL/s5Ks5gu5nh3dDPmbLQo0K10HGc5b49pX3NH4bolNr1749xYnlzPyEC0jGezM3L dzTOCBmC1c9ubopmI2Huv4ch7C3vbR8FkTIXlFrdY8/23RaFP6h9jm46HnjkmjGXvnLs6JAun TfKa8ccCxfbZ0o1DD9gWnR4yhbH4I9TMTrLfbS54JvF9cFYfA4j0o/E2NFZXhpcX9mnVxO9ZS JZ0jQcQlfVdNgJLRn7BjLwUr6oIxi7f28L4oMh9KIO9WDxkCjt/dEd5sKkQYoML8WUlP1uVm4 gD/DEEoXmgvA9npGK1FCE1NobkthW0zJmAjus4X4lLKhMSANfkvAQbg2arA+/h8RZ/CjSEWDT xdd3DW3kvXn81nQbV2dQ7MNXsXkDI6iZvfqq5cQGjjnXmDhoA4Ppm+PUMEJaYedzUge1Hl3TS g91lASUKD7cweoBu4/YMmCg6yJPNJ8Xct5f4dJvh05NyWiwGMwY/lhOrAL7YOYFdgyDhMMkGU 8OLpGdjc+x+UagVI66LfO0OCFxSgNE4JRQEjB9E4ZHNuNQt3fSEOa6xt3kTraERq2up944vFi jZsC/eX3b9ar/krsyTqONp3qEYjXDc65SHLxP/qB9c5LJ3thXkmoR9oeWpXcwJ4EVVaQopIcV +XLIX0rnKJxoIRNi9JM7KUvffLIEanWFZNL/b5X8Ta0vm7b1F/LI+kdN5koRQ/ABXT7mJrGna yP9UvMfamUTNVTV2k6d9G6zwNC89oFtOUqvSDNeua7IRP4+D+SeJKLVJru+kmLU9v2juYvfdn WPhnbEQU5Z2ADKA85+6nyTYxnWhnElivXzOUP2tZxhphZtq41PUGxCZP+4SLjGFUZPa+gPP// Aefe9XCLcnfYtvfBRK7+gjvk/mq9bMj8za1SFAv9r8bTRU/v6fcfIyJmgfMr1Cv4k9zhDB9Zw 38dvpcvdyC7m8SfN32TkbEUSZ96+ZG2QuKlgk1L1NbjGJ6LDYmFpZDfdR3Ys5T839ZF2/DwJj x680evMfiDFVUXET+wk/s2y5FSAbhr8NXmBeB7lgelXtjkj8tD X-UI-Loop:V01:Ejk5Aj5qOuw=:aLo3wqMck+36tgpf06PfgVd/D6AK0jlQ3NQWPKqbbY0= X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 85.214.41.38 Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7636 I think the relevant part of the doc is % Particularly, a number of broken or ugly design sizes are no % longer used, the look of the bold sans serif typeface at large % sizes is considerably improved, and mismatches between the text % fonts and the corresponding math fonts are avoided. As a side % effect, PostScript and PDF documents may become smaller, because % fewer fonts need to be embedded. So while like any design choice it could be questioned, I think the fact that it does not use all the provided design-size fonts is certainly deliberate. (I assume the above is Walter Schmidt's original documentation text, but I didn't check just now.) David