User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101
            Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20140627125102.GA10460@hzdr.de>           
            <5978C2CE-C53F-4DA4-9262-D9C151E0B962@gmail.com>           
            <20140628130457.GA17997@hzdr.de>           
            <53B50587.8060700@morningstar2.co.uk>           
            <20140703074723.GA23501@hzdr.de>           
            <53B51160.6070406@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <20140703121411.GA26068@hzdr.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID:  <53B550B0.4030502@morningstar2.co.uk>
Date:         Thu, 3 Jul 2014 13:46:40 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: Joseph Wright <joseph.wright@MORNINGSTAR2.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: missing l3box counterparts of graphics' \resizebox variants
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <20140703121411.GA26068@hzdr.de>
Precedence: list
Envelope-To: <rainer.schoepf@GMX.NET>
Status: R

On 03/07/2014 13:14, Alexander Grahn wrote:
> As for me, there is no rush. I guess `graphics' will continue to be
> loaded automatically by expl3 in the medium term. So, in my package,
> I am using \resizebox directly for the missing cases.
> 
> Alexander

You can certainly stick with graphicx, but note that we've switched the
driver code to default to 'native' mode. As a result, if you want
graphicx loaded you really should have the appropriate \RequirePackage line.
-- 
Joseph