Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id s140PvSY021268 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 01:25:58 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by mx-ha.gmx.net (mxgmx109) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0Mfjqa-1VpdbH0cui-00NDAt for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 01:25:51 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s140NC2p015641 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Feb 2014 01:23:12 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s13N15mx017908; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 01:23:12 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 10685410 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 01:23:12 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s140NB3w021548 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 01:23:11 +0100 Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com (mail-qc0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s140N3OB014254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 01:23:06 +0100 Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c9so12654284qcz.31 for ; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:23:03 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.49.109 with SMTP id p100mr57756589qga.52.1391473383119; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:23:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.22] ([199.202.146.57]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm50293636qax.3.2014.02.03.16.23.01 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:23:01 -0800 (PST) References: <52E8E264.4010800@gmail.com> <20140202092147.56667308@aga-netbook> <87iosx29nm.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <89ECE88578D8F648A22E307DAEE885794775B488@SRVUNIMBX07.uni.au.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B554a) Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de id s140NC3w021549 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:22:58 -0500 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Morten H=?UTF-8?Q?=C3=B8gholm?= Subject: Re: Feasibility of GUIs for authors and class designers in LaTeX3 To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id s140NC2p015641 Envelope-To: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=V3; X-GMX-Antivirus: 0 (no virus found) X-UI-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:YK9Y2l+gJhc=:Jnp8lYREDQXNbuNG5pL1HZzKMp y7byy3DXzWVHDudteS/hYuSd2EcnGhjX1gBSKELjYRCi01mxoBqR2pprOK214y+EMXtaVXdmX dMg4sizXToZHbFwuUC+D6x0hVVwXu31cmt9wluePJZhGfOKUaKw6hoqrPlzuxYHTtwNEEYprk Q5nD3U/vAEYFJpDl9ghU9MNrMp6om1QZKPw/f8GMb835OATJ9s9htMH09rSojad5BPngf5D4A iShN/Rp+CDWZ92czzVaNiyBUrHaiH556G42/3SBnvqv9B2yqgYaImuQzK6wyl4V1VsMa8xBke 3Cga/VIlsLyBg1okpWg1ANx9KmLkNFoJQdSpz652hD1obOHvWwvNTZg0R2eqh2mRyf64B4Q69 4U1h8HBoafWG6AbHBWaZqIwGEsDuyIHa3ET617Jyi9o8iEpjvcRSiWIMflN1fa2U4O+/qLhvc 0Bj2cok127XapaUPK31XeinaUNG/qnX2JGnFlMHNYewc8ZH2FhMBQa6xSJm7MobPvTkhzDnJd x5w121T290BTwv+yxN/uLcbmw1F3JMtz5NFz/Xt5sDuj8V57LSlKgD+atFqKW2Vc/RvtyJFUU 74w5pSolFLpRu8nC7z4ly3H26yOqMmExgELKbAOrLNECxXHpnaJ/2LG6mhPWQmOFsh+mKvvyO CIGjl8xBEHah7bCg5QIXHvB1Por4TxFJEwTqku/M8IAe0Cp3P+9AF23TfsxqG0OqoY3ZGf6kv Yr3qV1H4txjwR843z+uVM9FiKp7uj5SnYdglGj+fR0exsfuhseFNYU8rI4JjcL2M9vuVfulwq 2hZz01UyqxjbUi4VF/S8JYOerhgO+h3JkjFQ3Drw4lcS0O8HYPljYqOZJ/OpRtddzUIOM+xXH Wh1PRsVwL47V+P0OYqWTEUInDxqkefLI8neqxqFTV8bNja2tDSaxk35xJI59afFqt4SJcE6cM BR0JoIL+d24/BEFawitLNovwm6QEKleDMuWbDZxsAZ45GbcoPxgOyzvCbLnMc9pinPJfXU5WZ MSHILsbt6UFV8gDnY0oiDOqnzFOu762g5BFbwrcq+2QeMIZeBBFe9CZTO6enPBeHcthXXO8Vo N9AYmlvhLHj6xwIyBWRA4vSlKj2ULrCbC06oaqwk8EzuLRUISgAPvfxXftM1Vw73Ms2YgBf6N dmMGfM68z4nYdEaL9IdCGl4DyRjo16a8Fvf+koavsy6XoTiigjE0mQYxKL3NDUx2B4ZU4O4Rw Zq1WzzleD/ucxKkRV9n5NuBGLqzFjTVvYXdvkz6GDQfBlyHP05jVS5650R5xaNozc/Urutt0k NBXuxv2z2Qk3lg08btkbHxdL9qLn2UO+r3qpoN/O8d7eFuCSROxshuO7Sae4ySOYnfZZOfsvj YV0z/GeNioG7xIGktbLB5XtkiQaihelaKlP1zhvDibkHHp/YUwoP1jNnjXN X-UI-Loop:V01:KZbSSyGnVFE=:3zd2RnDhzEsLL0+4s6bGDX+gVORR1C0K1oJW3GLW9J0= Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7330 >=20 > On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Barbara Beeton wrote: >=20 > On Sun, 2 Feb 2014, William F Hammond wrote: >=20 > [...] >=20 > In the new track with its pertinent user-level diagnostics one could= have > the LaTeX program print a diagnostic and then exit, forcing the user= to > correct the problem, one problem at a time. >=20 > sadly, this would discourage me, and > probably anyone else involved in a > production setting, from using the > new track if it is set up unalterably > this way. =20 I agree. This would to me feel like having a misspelled word prevent you = from printing out the document past the point of misspelling. Compiling c= ode is one thing, =91compiling=92 a document could be a little more forgi= ving I think.=20 Morten=20