User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101
            Thunderbird/23.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID:  <51E84D20.2010800@gmail.com>
Date:         Fri, 19 Jul 2013 04:16:32 +0800
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: Qing Lee <sobenlee@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Defining \int_step_break: and \int_step_break:n
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Precedence: list
Envelope-To: <rainer.schoepf@GMX.NET>
Status: R

Hi,

I think they are useful as other map break functions.
Now I can define them as follows. They can work in 
`\int_step_inline:nnnn`. Although their definitions are a little weird.

\cs_new_nopar:Npn \int_step_break:
   { \__prg_map_break:Nn \scan_stop: { } }
\cs_new_nopar:Npn \int_step_break:n
   { \__prg_map_break:Nn \scan_stop: }

There are some more work in `\int_step_function:nnnN` case.
Maybe I missed something. Please let me know.

Regards,
-- 
Qing Lee