Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id q51GFnom005226 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:15:50 +0200 Received: (qmail 24358 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2012 16:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jun 2012 16:15:44 -0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.100.212] by mx0.gmx.net (mx068) with SMTP; 01 Jun 2012 18:15:44 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q51GCfuJ000742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:12:41 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q51FAMAH019464; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:12:40 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 2076795 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:12:40 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q51GCewg001228 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:12:40 +0200 Received: from smtp.demon.co.uk (mdfmta010.mxout.tbr.inty.net [91.221.168.51]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q51GCPj5000651 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:12:33 +0200 Received: from mdfmta010.tbr.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta010.tbr.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9186F80EF for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:12:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from mdfmta010.tbr.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta010.tbr.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631216F809F for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:12:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from palladium.local (unknown [80.176.134.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mdfmta010.tbr.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:12:23 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MDF-HostID: 3 Message-ID: <4FC8E9E6.2090202@morningstar2.co.uk> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:12:22 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Joseph Wright Subject: Re: xparse -- Warning "xparse/redefine-command" To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Sender is in whitelist: joseph.wright@MORNINGSTAR2.CO.UK); Detail=5D7Q89H36p4L00VTXC6D4q0N+AH0PUCnBi0P5cROEGjO+pG7NAH/K+tf9SrVFtpLrKONl 2T9EL4W4U4jgzLbnCcGpk1z/zwmKT/K1fv3lD0=V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7063 On 01/06/2012 11:47, Marco Daniel wrote: > Hi, > > If you use the command \DeclareDocumentCommand and the command name > already exists, you will get the warning "LaTeX warning > "xparse/redefine-command" " initialized by > > \msg_kernel_warning:nnxx { xparse } { redefine-command } > > > I think most package authors will use this command. (e.g. fontspec) > > Based on this fact you will get a lot of warnings. In my opinion > warnings become ineffectually. > > So I suggest to use \msg_kernel_info:nnxx { xparse } { redefine-command } > > What do you think? This is 'by design'. The reasoning is that altering an existing command potentially changes the interfaces defined in a document, and so deserves a warning in the log. You can of course redirect these warnings to info before loading xparse, if you feel this is appropriate. -- Joseph Wright