Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id q12MN4KV028569 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 23:23:06 +0100 Received: (qmail 5429 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2012 22:22:59 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Feb 2012 22:22:59 -0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay2.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.210.211] by mx0.gmx.net (mx113) with SMTP; 02 Feb 2012 23:22:59 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q12LkNBQ020202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:46:24 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q12LVFwX005897; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:46:23 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 2079413 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:46:23 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q12LkNWx005968 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:46:23 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q12Lk5od025924 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:46:08 +0100 Received: from mittelbach-online.de (p3EE3EAAC.dip.t-dialin.net [62.227.234.172]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MH5MY-1RoAvu3c70-00EDLF; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:46:05 +0100 Received: by mittelbach-online.de (Postfix, from userid 783) id 3326C1721D94; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:45:59 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on Marlowe X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.123.100]) (Authenticated sender: frank) by mittelbach-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10C931721D8C for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:45:57 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120202102957.GB14566@csmvddesktop> <4F2A68F9.1010508@morningstar2.co.uk> <20120202111808.GA15304@csmvddesktop> <4F2AC338.2060505@residenset.net> <4F2AFFAD.6070504@morningstar2.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120202-2, 02.02.2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:sOnIlaaLiJelrI0KkYxo5u9eXDrWAckiNn20MtvGmi/ bQXU9R1fzFd/21/yl+d8rCkvVzhO7KfWQuzOma/0jht9I3qumK +cYFABcg/aWqpz43rexvM5s7UubU9UvEpWeZ7G4XDSq/qHVSkV wM4PPtvZ1jVxfayH1/RJ0siaUlFF4HCaqCh7KwrgdzSM8r3SFf uBDPp7cCnaCm7PENxnbmqMFV77ZDbGBbuHP/Rw2ENzcP8Ew62R mmCeFmTGrUaIRS+6tn8EvgF7fkKlWWbKHwrbvZJ4SdTSqKOYrB 720FHaN8rCbJJqsr7pz8UAPdz4caSoGltxVilIUiETKDFMbKII BSwnRKNHEM2KNOjeG86m1fv3eiRk9w/6fmvp+v1Xm Message-ID: <4F2B0415.6060109@latex-project.org> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:45:57 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Frank Mittelbach Subject: Re: Mapping Functions Versions for All and Some To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: <4F2AFFAD.6070504@morningstar2.co.uk> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (eXpurgate); Detail=5D7Q89H36p6NW8kflD/cSXBhdabbS3lN1JDkmySDgxl3DRs4nzrDkvK7NH7flj/0XXX1y xvaoQj+OedwsBsvLANL/Haj2MOEihl30+iQCu1vdaC1TM2iW5h9Yfj/MATamCcKmQB0r9UTPnxNX T6fXQLrInkCso4wCgdiysVB7Fr+wixR67pzN4Gc+Gi5EP3GLyeTDVTqhmc=V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7012 Am 02.02.2012 22:27, schrieb Joseph Wright: > On 02/02/2012 18:35, Bruno Le Floch wrote: >>> My preference is for "regexp", but I can see it might by now be a bit >>> awkward to change it. >> >> My original argument in favor of regex (besides the fact that >> Wikipedia's regex(p|) page uses that and that it's shorter) is that it >> matches nicely with (La|)TeX. Before I planned to include it in >> LaTeX3, I thought of calling the package ReGeX. :-) > > In TeX parlance, it would be regexpr (think \numexpr, etc.), which for > me is too long. So I favour regex. for what it is worth I also prefer regex frank