Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id p9C3ACun026250 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:10:13 +0200 Received: (qmail 428 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2011 03:10:07 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2011 03:10:07 -0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay2.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.210.211] by mx0.gmx.net (mx117) with SMTP; 12 Oct 2011 05:10:07 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9C37Jt9013159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:07:19 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p9BM142Q003205; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:07:18 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 1794366 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:07:18 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p9C37IK4026459 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:07:18 +0200 Received: from mail-ey0-f177.google.com (mail-ey0-f177.google.com [209.85.215.177]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p9C37DrX017751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:07:17 +0200 Received: by eye3 with SMTP id 3so365767eye.22 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:07:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.61.211 with SMTP id u19mr43625916fah.29.1318388833738; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.4.193 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:07:13 -0700 (PDT) References: <4E945D77.6090309@morningstar2.co.uk> <20111011153219.GA3677@oberdiek.my-fqdn.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Whitelist: Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:07:13 -0400 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Bruno Le Floch Subject: Re: Strings, and regular expressions To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: <20111011153219.GA3677@oberdiek.my-fqdn.de> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (eXpurgate); Detail=5D7Q89H36p7zYQev1Bv5lRRT+QR/z/3ZTIsWMTj5fnxPyR32axf2+vJfyORZ2SUB/kRzX rhjiXAU/qDyG+sc1byhYN4Ylea4XnrQ6i/K/gr20EMXncw3wLfQKy3EJhePLTbJWt+vNtzT4GhCF +1/ZjOyWeTztoVq/J1532F+Mk0IZuvWC7Cnai2H7/SwdtlR8vLMllhRx6Y=V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6917 > hyperref already reencodes bookmark strings with setting > pdfencoding=auto. The bookmark string is construced in > Unicode encoding. Then the reencoding to PDFDocEncoding is tried. > If successful the result string is used, otherwise the Unicode string. > For the reencoding stuff package stringenc is used and don't need > to be expandable for hyperref. Thank you Heiko. The stringenc package provides _many_ different encodings. Can you point me to which are useful for pdf purposes? I guess that most "iso-..." and "cp..." encodings are an overkill for a kernel. Also, when you say "Unicode encoding", I presume that this means native strings for XeTeX and LuaTeX, but what about pdfTeX? Do you use "UTF-16" (if so, LE or BE?), or some other UTF? -- Bruno