Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id p8LGbMCP026083 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:37:23 +0200 Received: (qmail 16690 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2011 16:37:16 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2011 16:37:16 -0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.100.212] by mx0.gmx.net (mx053) with SMTP; 21 Sep 2011 18:37:16 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p8LGYhcK031345 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:34:43 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p8LGSBiH023745; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:34:42 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 1625280 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:34:42 +0200 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p8LGYg7U011034 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:34:42 +0200 Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8LGYc8k028791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:34:42 +0200 Received: by fxg7 with SMTP id 7so2722463fxg.22 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:34:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.22.150 with SMTP id n22mr1306531fab.110.1316622878047; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:34:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.23.67 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:34:37 -0700 (PDT) References: <4E79D279.2050901@morningstar2.co.uk> <4E79E2B7.6080906@residenset.net> <4E79E8C1.8060107@morningstar2.co.uk> <4E79F0F7.7060400@residenset.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Whitelist: Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:34:37 -0400 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Bruno Le Floch Subject: Re: \interlinepenalties To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: <4E79F0F7.7060400@residenset.net> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (BackTrace mail analyze); Detail=5D7Q89H36p4L00VTXC6D4q0N+AH0PUCnGL2vqOgpaBYL16oitsMrgDt/NQNpSCZFFjDOy 97xb7Zpf+wZnd5ZXNcvLDXR3Wg3wRjdQbwEMh8=V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6891 >>>> I am currently working on some galley-related code, and looking at the >>>> e-TeX extensions to Knuth's paragraph-breaking penalty system. The roles >>>> of \clubpenalties, \widowpenalties and \displaywidowpenalties are clear, >>>> and it seems reasonable to provide a documented interface to these >>>> primitives. On the other hand, \interlinepenalties Context uses it in \keeplinestogether, but I don't see why they couldn't have used \clubpenalties instead. I don't understand the difference between \interlinepenalties and \clubpenalties as described in etex_man: - the ith interline penalty value is used after line i of the paragraph; - the ith club penalty value is used after line i of a partial paragraph; All other hits on Google are either irrelevant, l3names, context, or on the german ctt (perhaps some info there). -- Bruno