References: <B05A09B5-1199-466E-A812-679D76C15C73@gmail.com>
            <4E76ECA9.7090809@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <5A0E41A1-0D4D-419C-984F-6EDA8992A6C9@gmail.com>
            <CANQYN6ztrtway-5xYn7cJ4Ko+pwJ7x-C=_qxpbpfvPV-Na5E7w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8L1)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-980631610
Message-ID:  <2DF91961-4745-49E7-82CD-0E409A0F4C09@gmail.com>
Date:         Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:02:39 +0930
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de>
From: Will Robertson <wspr81@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: \msg_four_spaces:
To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de
In-Reply-To:  <CANQYN6ztrtway-5xYn7cJ4Ko+pwJ7x-C=_qxpbpfvPV-Na5E7w@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: list
Status: R

--Apple-Mail-1-980631610
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

(Sent quickly. Please excuse brevity.)

On 19/09/2011, at 11:51 PM, Bruno Le Floch <blflatex@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

>> Oh yes, `\ \ \ \ ` would be pretty good. (My brain thought they'd be
>> concatenated for some reason and I didn't try it. Distracted by other wor=
k,
>> I suppose.)
>=20
> They're actually lost nowhere (e.g., not even after unfinished f-expansion=
)

Yeah, silly me.=20

>=20
>> I'm probably happy to leave things as they are for now. In fact, any sort=
 of
>> "indent" function would be better if it respected the line-wrapping routi=
ne
>> and that's more work than it's worth right now. I'll table this thought i=
n
>> the Github wiki.
>=20
> Do you mean \msg_indent:n {<text to indent that may be line-wrapped>} ?

Aye :-)

W=

--Apple-Mail-1-980631610
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=utf-8

<html><body bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><div>(Sent quickly. Please excuse brevity.)<=
/div><div><br>On 19/09/2011, at 11:51 PM, Bruno Le Floch &lt;<a href=3D"mail=
to:blflatex@GMAIL.COM">blflatex@GMAIL.COM</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br></div><div><=
/div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>Oh yes, `=
\ \ \ \ ` would be pretty good. (My brain thought they'd be</span><br></bloc=
kquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>concatenated for some reason and I di=
dn't try it. Distracted by other work,</span><br></blockquote><blockquote ty=
pe=3D"cite"><span>I suppose.)</span><br></blockquote><span></span><br><span>=
They're actually lost nowhere (e.g., not even after unfinished f-expansion)<=
/span><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah, silly me.&nbsp;</div>=
<div><br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><span></span><blockquote type=3D=
"cite"><span>I'm probably happy to leave things as they are for now. In fact=
, any sort of</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>"indent=
" function would be better if it respected the line-wrapping routine</span><=
br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>and that's more work than it=
's worth right now. I'll table this thought in</span><br></blockquote><block=
quote type=3D"cite"><span>the Github wiki.</span><br></blockquote><span></sp=
an><br><span>Do you mean \msg_indent:n {&lt;text to indent that may be line-=
wrapped&gt;} ?</span><font class=3D"Apple-style-span" color=3D"#000000"><fon=
t class=3D"Apple-style-span" color=3D"#0023A3"><br></font></font></div></blo=
ckquote><br><div>Aye :-)</div><div><br></div><div>W</div></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail-1-980631610--