Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id p8JEOmuC026601 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:24:50 +0200 Received: (qmail 19913 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2011 14:24:40 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2011 14:24:40 -0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.100.212] by mx0.gmx.net (mx116) with SMTP; 19 Sep 2011 16:24:40 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p8JELqGb027860 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:21:52 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p8JCqlvg018389; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:21:51 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 1621026 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:21:51 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p8JELpWX015540 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:21:51 +0200 Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p8JELjLN027823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:21:49 +0200 Received: by fxg7 with SMTP id 7so5866360fxg.22 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:21:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.22.150 with SMTP id n22mr5214233fab.110.1316442104899; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:21:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.25.69 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:21:44 -0700 (PDT) References: <4E76ECA9.7090809@morningstar2.co.uk> <5A0E41A1-0D4D-419C-984F-6EDA8992A6C9@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Whitelist: Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:21:44 -0400 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Bruno Le Floch Subject: Re: \msg_four_spaces: To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: <5A0E41A1-0D4D-419C-984F-6EDA8992A6C9@gmail.com> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (BackTrace mail analyze); Detail=5D7Q89H36p4L00VTXC6D4q0N+AH0PUCnGL2vqOgpaBYL16oitsMrgDt/NQNpSCZFFjDOy 97xb7Zpf+wZnd5ZXNcvLDXR3Wg3wRjdQbwEMh8=V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6882 > Oh yes, `\ \ \ \ ` would be pretty good. (My brain thought they'd be > concatenated for some reason and I didn't try it. Distracted by other work, > I suppose.) They're actually lost nowhere (e.g., not even after unfinished f-expansion) > I'm probably happy to leave things as they are for now. In fact, any sort of > "indent" function would be better if it respected the line-wrapping routine > and that's more work than it's worth right now. I'll table this thought in > the Github wiki. Do you mean \msg_indent:n {} ? Bruno