Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id p838vYoL030609 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:57:35 +0200 Received: (qmail 23827 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2011 08:57:29 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Sep 2011 08:57:28 -0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.100.212] by mx0.gmx.net (mx092) with SMTP; 03 Sep 2011 10:57:28 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p838tMtW011396 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:55:22 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p836sTJr021288; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:55:21 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 1604195 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:55:21 +0200 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p838tLKK024782 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:55:21 +0200 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.8]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p838tAmP011612 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:55:13 +0200 Received: from mittelbach-online.de (p3EE3FDE3.dip.t-dialin.net [62.227.253.227]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MQ5lz-1R4Shq3UuZ-0057LK; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:55:10 +0200 Received: by mittelbach-online.de (Postfix, from userid 783) id EE3011F2A334; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:55:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on Marlowe X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.123.104]) (Authenticated sender: frank) by mittelbach-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 072621F2A331 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:55:04 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110902-1, 02.09.2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:mhBmxBlO/qcVlaBBBGup1IGSAI24EGBAsrfMRjogMwP GbIhW9NJNF2d2l/9A+jgNc/1xGfHfIh/C9g9ol6AH+TLfZUksM 9tIsXO5977o82Ub0EtbOkPGujfDVJvLv511vkxOx57H9YjOmFU T9fApEDu9tG4E/El22TQZIO9HBlEwm90y2HQiwh73oE++M2PN5 zs1b3BVoOrghBCr4zQFotDaLdcNmU8pN905OIfECFSljvOJwF3 eT2kKfV9dcJd7qJ9IgsiPTFx0mFSxjhsnfbu89StOA7jgbCAg4 bbpIayS/Tysez8u5X72sN31Al34KuFxIDUdM+ZQKtXtdzKEHXc +Izmn5N2RKCycvnR0z9jm9j7VLXB7wnJrySOC40tk Message-ID: <4E61EB56.3020204@latex-project.org> Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:54:46 +0200 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Frank Mittelbach Subject: Re: NFSS bug (!) To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (eXpurgate); Detail=5D7Q89H36p6sJLDpZh614Kjz2nt6F3tHzrM8zWLjSO7+tJsrOZOgK3H+50RJzekTCOMvZ OFtElKAsbXzRkMBIqARwNsURDJHQVG9otQGImIrrnOgjBNoXt9l1QuN5QG8KsZdMmNf4WnEqxXLn vOjfG2kSGJoeUi1nWhWqMsVKFnT84mnuHOkx3MgD2KHDeSE4ANvVdZs4ZM=V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6861 Am 03.09.2011 08:52, schrieb Will Robertson: > > The culprit being largely the following line in \new@mathversion: > > \global\expandafter\newcount\csname c@\expandafter > \@gobble\string#1\endcsname > > When the lower level of registers runs out, etex.sty's \alloc@ > redefines \newcount to use the extended pool; the execution of this > branch throws an error when preceded by \global. that's an interesting one :-) > As far as I know writing \global\newcount is the same as \newcount, > so I'll change this in the 2e code. it looks like with \alloc@ having \global as part of its definition. However,I don't think that was always the case (in plain.tex all these definitions are local for example) maybe that's the reason why that global is there. But then it might be just some unnecessary piece of code which now starts producing trouble frank