User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; de; rv:1.9.2.13)
            Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <27764.1297187486@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Jabber-ID: schneeschmelze@jabber.ccc.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID:  <4D51963B.409@GMX.DE>
Date:         Tue, 8 Feb 2011 20:15:07 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de>
From: Juergen Fenn <juergen.fenn@GMX.DE>
Organization: juergenfenn.de
Subject: Re: latexsearch.com: a new resource for mathematical typesetting
To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de
In-Reply-To:  <27764.1297187486@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Precedence: list
Status: R

Am 08.02.11 18:51 schrieb Robin Fairbairns:

>> Oh my FSM. Is that actually supposed to _help_ anybody? [...]

>> wouldn't it be much better if she just wrote [...]

> indeed.  [...] 

> a collection of rational coding of mathematical examples might be useful
> (and explanations as you mention would make it more useful still), but
> that requires work with something more sensitive than a shovel, which
> would appear to be what's used here.

Well, this /is/ what folks out there actually do when they use LaTeX for
typesetting scientific papers and books. Not a best practice collection,
but you can get an impression of sorts what kind of code Springer
accepts from its authors...

Regards,
Jürgen.