MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <201101230906.p0N96bln024353@comedy.dante.de>
            <A246A33A-C2AA-4B72-A614-C720E0DB0CD0@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Message-ID:  <AANLkTimLNd8wnLiONU0H7eHMY=vDfWakT052gQy+WH2T@mail.gmail.com>
Date:         Sun, 23 Jan 2011 03:36:47 -0600
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de>
From: Kevin Godby <godbyk@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: \clist_length:N and \clist_nth:N
To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de
In-Reply-To:  <A246A33A-C2AA-4B72-A614-C720E0DB0CD0@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
Status: R

Hello, Will.

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Will Robertson <wspr81@gmail.com> wrote:
> Questions: names? I think "length" is a good one although it doesn't match \tl_elt_count:N which is the equivalent for arbitrary token lists.
>
> I didn't write "clist_nth" with a view of it being the permanent name, but now that I've written it I can't think of a (good) alternative. Any thoughts?

The only other names that come to mind for clist_nth would be
clist_get or clist_element.  I don't know that either of those are any
clearer, however.

--Kevin Godby