User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13)
            Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <776139.69852.qm@web28615.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>                      
            <4D2B0633.5000004@morningstar2.co.uk>                      
            <4D2B08FF.3000303@morningstar2.co.uk>           
            <1ADEC11E-40E4-481B-A7A3-D0986955131A@yahoo.de>
            <4D2B6B03.60905@morningstar2.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID:  <4D2B6E25.9070006@morningstar2.co.uk>
Date:         Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:37:57 +0000
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de>
From: Joseph Wright <joseph.wright@MORNINGSTAR2.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: newest expl3 broken
To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de
In-Reply-To:  <4D2B6B03.60905@morningstar2.co.uk>
Precedence: list
Status: R

On 10/01/2011 20:24, Joseph Wright wrote:
> We do have one :-) However, coverage is not 100% and it would not help
> here as the tests all run on pdfTeX (faster, etc.). Apart from
> \pdfstrcmp, there is not currently any other engine variation apart from
> l3luatex, so the need has not really come up.

Of course, we are always trying to extend it. For example, I'm just
adding some more tests at the moment! I'll see what can be done about
the Lua situation.
-- 
Joseph Wright