Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id p0AKIXBm026069 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:18:35 +0100 Received: (qmail 2005 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2011 20:18:28 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2011 20:18:28 -0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.100.212] by mx0.gmx.net (mx038) with SMTP; 10 Jan 2011 21:18:28 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p0AKGRjJ013888 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:16:27 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p0AGSNcF028747; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:16:18 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 824962 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:16:18 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p0AKGIqQ013628 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:16:18 +0100 Received: from nm28-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm28-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.22]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id p0AKG5lR018134 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:16:09 +0100 Received: from [98.138.90.57] by nm28.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jan 2011 20:16:04 -0000 Received: from [98.138.84.33] by tm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jan 2011 20:16:04 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jan 2011 20:16:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 635888.269.bm@smtp101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: from [192.168.1.70] (st_philipp@92.224.202.188 with plain) by smtp101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2011 12:16:04 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: _jlT6bOswBCTfNEaYibKorijSw14_bs- X-YMail-OSG: 3jcTCQYVM1mOgXYtldMQ0lQ30fjKV4PTjLnxfGj6VQyhjoN 25IqcoCHbG.zVNXixmL4GSB6eYbUkB5AFTX2E1JLcCa73oUH1YkN1Cw4597b MRQhJVWYyAaWSp1aCZd3dodJa5HBudmtYiQziOamM6h.knNElRruxC.pq6fu 0S.540G84jLjLNRfzKiGqZH0a4zTKOxpjoI2OWhZnhb_NN4D8SkmJWil1yIM 7ZUUmKK9tcP04ujjF.cvsmiHzvtjj5qY9XFh69EC1Iwiw1waW4NCd51WUJLf 4fpkVZr4N39koOTfugKQf6krys.gnCHOC8uQEpBELlo8nSlCDpgmBAlno9Yw _AZ00l8aoHkL_rBXvJG51zAQ6hGGrJ62zPUnIhw-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) References: <776139.69852.qm@web28615.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4D2B0633.5000004@morningstar2.co.uk> <4D2B08FF.3000303@morningstar2.co.uk> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de id p0AKGIqQ013629 Message-ID: <1ADEC11E-40E4-481B-A7A3-D0986955131A@yahoo.de> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:16:04 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Philipp Stephani Subject: Re: newest expl3 broken To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: <4D2B08FF.3000303@morningstar2.co.uk> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=5D7Q89H36p77e5KAPs1l6v/Sb97LojnDtMgfETrECMLUO9erHzOJe+OynZRhvlGqb5A0X bbiCt2rAnnct/NAlbHMvoAL6GY+23tB3khNK7Y6oT1sPizBjJUAOds0oJBO/5TIz9C5741aj9GOJ bE70Q==V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6558 Am 10.01.2011 um 14:26 schrieb Joseph Wright: > On 10/01/2011 13:14, Joseph Wright wrote: >> Already fixed in the SVN: I noticed this late on Friday. (The luatex >> package moves various primitives out of the way, and I'd forgotten this. >> Sorry.) >> >> I'll get a CTAN snapshot done in a second. > > Might be this evening: I need to sort out the building on Windows, so > will do it from my Mac at home. Thanks for responding so quickly. BTW, have you considered writing a test suite that would prevent such errors?