Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id o8FJcIll025758 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:38:19 +0200 Received: (qmail 8903 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2010 19:38:13 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2010 19:38:12 -0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.100.212] by mx0.gmx.net (mx086) with SMTP; 15 Sep 2010 21:38:12 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o8FJa1Tw006258 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:36:02 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o8FH39xS024841; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:36:26 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 512480 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:36:26 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o8FJaQUH016326 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:36:26 +0200 Received: from mta2.cl.cam.ac.uk (mta2.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.0.14]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o8FJZixX006020 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:35:47 +0200 Received: from sxp10.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.10.70] helo=cl.cam.ac.uk) by mta2.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.092 #1) id 1Ovxm9-0008WV-00 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:36:13 +0100 X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 22.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de id o8FJaQUH016331 Message-ID: <19109.1284579373@cl.cam.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:36:13 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Robin Fairbairns Subject: Re: Allocation of registers To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:18:00 +0200. <19601.3544.205618.448915@morse.mittelbach-online.de> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=5D7Q89H36p77e5KAPs1l6v/Sb97LojnDtMgfETrECMLUO9erHzOJe+OynZRhvlGqb5A0X bbiCt2rAnnct/NAlbHMvoAL6GY+23tB3khNK7bp7qqSbssdDTHsQd8+gWzfjr4OMj5ambWQGofKK 3vIsQ==V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6377 Frank Mittelbach wrote: > Joseph Wright writes: > > On 15/09/2010 15:18, Morten Høgholm wrote: > > > On 15/09/2010, at 14.39, Joseph Wright wrote: > > > > > >> On 15/09/2010 06:33, Heiko Oberdiek wrote: > > >>> At least etex.sty provides \reserveinserts. > > >> > > >> This I did not know. Perhaps expl3 should make sure it leaves some 'space' for inserts to be safe. Now, what I don't know is how many might be needed. > > > > > > I usually reserve 30 or so before loading a 'heavy' document class such as memoir. > > > > Perhaps expl3 should do the same? I guess that 30 inserts would cover > > most cases (or am I wildly out?) > > I guess for the time being that is a good approach is there an actual reason that inserts can't start working down from 64k? etex.sty can't do this, because the basic set of inserts has been allocated by the time it gets to run, and that plainly isn't a constraint on latex 3. but does it matter for expl3? (i have once spent time on thinking this issue through, but i'm not well -- still -- and can't remember what conclusion i came to.) robin on a "broadband" line that's having trouble shifting bits faster than the snails in the garden could...