Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id o2UAAbST023873 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:10:39 +0200 Received: (qmail 29752 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2010 10:10:32 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2010 10:10:31 -0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay2.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.210.211] by mx0.gmx.net (mx104) with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 12:10:31 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2UA8Eo3005532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:08:15 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o2TM26ZS005642; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:08:14 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 385111 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:08:14 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o2UA8DFn000511 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:08:13 +0200 Received: from csep02.cliche.se (csep02.cliche.se [195.249.40.184]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2UA7vNa000813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:08:01 +0200 Received: from hexley.local (unknown [213.21.117.168]) by csep02.cliche.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F701186676; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:08:02 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100330015247.GA24070@oberdiek.my-fqdn.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de id o2UA8DFn000512 Message-ID: <4BB1CDC2.5000103@residenset.net> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:09:06 +0200 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_Hellstr=F6m?= Subject: Re: latex/3540: \DoNotIndex{\#,\$,\%,\^,\_,\~,\ ,\&,\{,\}} To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: <20100330015247.GA24070@oberdiek.my-fqdn.de> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=5D7Q89H36p6i75npGen84eVAEFK/syJmFuaL1OLtauwJ5R/kaZ9HAe8peGX1DeqJYTcon 3bvVAat2VgIIwDvGHk2iJ8SK2vcWsidNyPYmt/3qYC38eHth5J9rzKCneOvOHFTDGwVio4KF1cMC ST+og==V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6328 Heiko Oberdiek skrev: > Hello, > > this is an answer to an old LaTeX bug (see LaTeX bug database). > Unhappily I can't write an answer to the LaTeX bug system. > After three failed tries I have to use this list for that. > Please update the help text in the database: > * How to answer to a bug entry? > * Which email address(es)? > Probably: latex-bugs@latex-project.org > Anything else? > How is the bug reporter is notified, if the answering > person is different? > * From address? > Is any address allowed or it is limited to > the bug reporter and authorisized people (LaTeX team)? This reminds me: Several years ago (say 2003 \pm 2 years) there seemed to have been some kind of upgrade of the database software, and after that several replies I had written were no longer there. That is, they used to be visible in the web page generated for a particular bug number, but afterwards they aren't included. Indeed, I get the feeling that you seldom *see* more than the original report for any bug. This is BAD. > * Subject? > I have seen > Re: / > and > Re: /: > * Are there delays in the processing of mails send to the > bug database regarding answers (cronjob, moderation, ...)? > > For bug latex/3540 there are workarounds: Easier workaround, which also solves a bunch of other problems in this area: \usepackage{xdoc2} This might even have been entered into the database at some time, though I think it must have been for an older bug than latex/3540. Lars Hellström