Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id o1B189qe030098 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:08:10 +0100 Received: (qmail 4779 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2010 01:08:04 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2010 01:08:04 -0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay2.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.210.211] by mx0.gmx.net (mx056) with SMTP; 11 Feb 2010 02:08:04 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1B16G0A001461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:06:16 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1AN16fR007776; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:06:13 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 377296 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:06:13 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1B0uDcM015402 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:56:13 +0100 Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com (mail-ew0-f228.google.com [209.85.219.228]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o1B0uALE017147 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:56:13 +0100 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so720466ewy.8 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:56:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.1.147 with SMTP id 19mr2554551ebf.57.1265849769263; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:56:09 -0800 (PST) References: <4b6c8efc$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <09bdfa24-c77c-4f37-8c89-809befb28934@u41g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <4b6cc60a$0$6581$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <227E5CB1-DBE8-4956-94C6-9B9FD1B15A07@yahoo.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7c5a2bea02d6c362 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Whitelist: Message-ID: <68c491a61002101656i7da42524rcff715826184b6ca@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:56:09 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= Subject: Re: Newbie Question on LaTeX 3 Programming To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: <227E5CB1-DBE8-4956-94C6-9B9FD1B15A07@yahoo.de> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=5D7Q89H36p4WX0t+AtsdW7yLAyG7gjsvbuMBW1+iOcuX20PnIgZYSReJ2t5I3NmC7otWg svnvgvOP+eSmr2tc2TDb1dCoki7/0rILdCQ5J8e1Y1XT96mqS95amITWUgb1/CuXllYP54VpvjTX ujdQw==V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 85.214.41.38 Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6250 2010/2/11 Philipp Stephani : > I don't think that the problem lies in the lack of manpower: look at > Hans and Taco ;-) This is unfair. Hans and Taco have spent more than ten man-years working on ConTeXt & LuaTeX, while the LaTeX3 project for most of the last two decades was done by one guy in Mainz doing it only part-time - and writing some excellent books and raising a family at the same time. If you compare the time spent on the ConTeXt and the LaTeX core since say 1995, ConTeXt is way ahead. Best Martin