Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id o1B0EHQK023667 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:14:18 +0100 Received: (qmail 22133 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2010 00:14:12 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2010 00:14:11 -0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay2.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.210.211] by mx0.gmx.net (mx112) with SMTP; 11 Feb 2010 01:14:11 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1B0BFHw007057 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:11:15 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1AN16eL007776; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:11:13 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 377171 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:11:13 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1B0BDvA012892 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:11:13 +0100 Received: from mta2.cl.cam.ac.uk (mta2.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.0.14]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o1B0B3Tw021288 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:11:07 +0100 Received: from sxp10.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.10.70] helo=cl.cam.ac.uk) by mta2.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.092 #1) id 1NfMe6-000580-00 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:11:02 +0000 X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 22.3.1 Message-ID: <12840.1265847062@cl.cam.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:11:02 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Robin Fairbairns Subject: Re: LaTeX3 8-bit only? To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:16:48 +1030. <08431600-FDE2-4002-8A22-81CDD6AF300B@gmail.com> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=5D7Q89H36p77e5KAPs1l6v/Sb97LojnDtMgfETrECMLUO9erHzOJe+OynZRhvlGqvET/J 3dm2vHWnQHIuidpgLhS+P7NNYz+zyHLMY9yCwGeoj9BiPgazSVDQFsQIW5ndJCbWUGBVgH7296LE WpM6A==V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 85.214.41.38 Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6245 Will Robertson wrote: > On 11/02/2010, at 8:42 AM, Philipp Stephani wrote: > > > However, any of these has to be done quickly: If LaTeX 3 won't be > > finished before LuaTeX, it will be obsolete anyway. > > LaTeX3 and LuaTeX are orthogonal; one does not deprecate the > other. Certain aspects of the work the LaTeX3 project have done, such > as the expl3 macro language, might become less useful when/if LuaTeX > is the *only* widely used TeX engine. But until then LaTeX3 will not > assume the presence of a Lua programming environment. > > LuaTeX will not be backwards compatible with pdfTeX in the generated > output (i.e., two identical documents may have slightly different > hyphenation/justification choices and therefore different page > breaks). While the changes will obviously be rather small, I don't > think anyone can really predict when pdfTeX will stop being used. while this is all true, i don't believe it's the point philipp was making. at a certain point, latex 3 will lose the support of people sitting around waiting for it -- as they get older, they'll conclude there's no point in taking it up for the productive time left to them. in parallel, the arrival of "production" luatex is coming along fast, and some time in 2012[*], one assumes that the bright young things will be wanting to use it. if they're switching engine, they might look for a new package, and if latex 3 isn't around at that time, it will have missed a window. i thought philipp was suggesting that the luatex 2012 date may present a final window of opportunity for latex. the real point is that there _needn't_ be a "physical" causal relationship between luatex and latex 3 for the final advent of luatex to kill of the ambitions of latex 3. robin [*] d.v.