Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by h1439878.stratoserver.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with SMTP id o0U5w94r020165 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:58:10 +0100 Received: (qmail 9693 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2010 05:58:04 -0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to rainer.schoepf@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2010 05:58:03 -0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (EHLO relay2.uni-heidelberg.de) [129.206.210.211] by mx0.gmx.net (mx010) with SMTP; 30 Jan 2010 06:58:03 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0U5u46i015429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:56:06 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0TN2haU018576; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:47:36 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 380520 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:47:36 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0U5la0C019794 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:47:36 +0100 Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com (mail-yw0-f174.google.com [209.85.211.174]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0U5lUNv011414 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:47:34 +0100 Received: by ywh4 with SMTP id 4so340947ywh.10 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:47:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.167.19 with SMTP id u19mr2175912ano.182.1264830450937; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:47:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.105? (219-90-222-205.ip.adam.com.au [219.90.222.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm977810ywc.23.2010.01.29.21.47.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:47:29 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) References: <20100126100454.GA3626@oberdiek.my-fqdn.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Spam-Whitelist: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de id o0U5la0C019795 Message-ID: <52A85881-0913-4C40-9E33-364F19352EEA@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:17:23 +1030 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Will Robertson Subject: Re: LPPL revisions To: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de In-Reply-To: <20100126100454.GA3626@oberdiek.my-fqdn.de> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=5D7Q89H36p77e5KAPs1l6v/Sb97LojnDtMgfETrECMLUO9erHzOJe6KyumPEzQo/v49H/ 6WH16A3hVxdb50dQBMe/GhyW+KflE2xKxwMOEKvHDWk7UqJoh2LvyLXsywjCkfM1ILLlYNfmOEMt /DqUA==V1; X-Resent-By: Forwarder X-Resent-For: rainer.schoepf@gmx.net X-Resent-To: rainer@rainer-schoepf.de X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 85.214.41.38 Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6212 Hi Heiko, Good points, thanks for bringing them up. On 26/01/2010, at 8:34 PM, Heiko Oberdiek wrote: > Would it be possible to put older revisions to the LaTeX distribution > and add these links to http://www.latex-project.org/lppl/? > Otherwise there are many work that refers to a license that is not > officially available. I've updated the web page. If I get the go-ahead, I'm happy to add the older files to the LaTeX distribution as well. > Also if the license notice doesn't add a revision number > the problem remains: > > %% pig.dtx > %% Copyright 2005 M. Y. Name > % > % This work may be distributed and/or modified under the > % conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3 > % of this license or (at your option) any later version. > % The latest version of this license is in > % http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt > % and version 1.3 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX > % version 2005/12/01 or later. > > The latest sentence is wrong, because 1.3a, 1.3b are not part > of these LaTeX distributions and the user doesn't have the option > to choose these licenses. Do you also think it would be better to point the user towards www.latex-project.org/lppl/ instead? How about a re-write of the above along the following lines: % This work may be distributed and/or modified under the % conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3c % of this license or (at your option) any later version. % All versions of this license are available at % http://www.latex-project.org/lppl/ % and all distributions of LaTeX version 2005/12/01 or later contain % the latest version of the license at time of release. Personally I'd just drop the last two lines, but I'm probably not being considerate of those without (convenient) internet access by saying so. -- Will