Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:40:53 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAAMeqjE031197 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:40:52 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAAMcRuc025890 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:38:28 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAAGHAH0021466; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:38:24 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 377362 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:38:24 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAAMcOle023378 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:38:24 +0100 Received: from mail188.messagelabs.com (mail188.messagelabs.com [85.158.139.163]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id nAAMcDJh025062 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:38:16 +0100 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: davidc@nag.co.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-188.messagelabs.com!1257892693!19515359!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=nag.co.uk,-,- X-Originating-IP: [62.231.145.242] Received: (qmail 24909 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 22:38:13 -0000 Received: from nagmx1.nag.co.uk (HELO nagmx1.nag.co.uk) (62.231.145.242) by server-2.tower-188.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 22:38:13 -0000 Received: from edinburgh.nag.co.uk (edinburgh.nag.co.uk [192.156.217.171]) by nagmx1.nag.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B718912015F for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:38:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from edinburgh.nag.co.uk (edinburgh.nag.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) by edinburgh.nag.co.uk (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id nAAMc9iX026310 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:38:09 GMT Received: (from davidc@localhost) by edinburgh.nag.co.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id nAAMc9WM026307; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:38:09 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: edinburgh.nag.co.uk: davidc set sender to davidc@nag.co.uk using -f References: <19189.17593.814557.704925@morse.mittelbach-online.de> <4AF5A79B.9040003@residenset.net> <19189.49743.74826.581704@morse.mittelbach-online.de> <004001ca6051$e9e35e10$bdaa1a30$@de> <19192.38156.431785.622764@morse.mittelbach-online.de> <002101ca61d4$f322ddf0$d96899d0$@de>, <20C53106-7650-4EAC-82C1-BEF0EFA17816@gmail.com> <200911102144.nAALiX8D024641@edinburgh.nag.co.uk> Message-ID: <200911102238.nAAMc9WM026307@edinburgh.nag.co.uk> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:38:09 GMT Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: David Carlisle Subject: mathml (was: an object type for heading commands) To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: (message from Will Robertson on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:25:01 +1030) Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -6.599 () BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2009 22:40:53.0252 (UTC) FILETIME=[DC147C40:01CA6256] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6164 > How do you access the unicode range of symbols in pmml2tex? I mean, > obviously they can be translated to TeX names via bb's STIX table, actually older data than the stix table http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007xml/unicode.xml which began life in Sebastian's jadetex distribution a lifetime ago. Although I sync up with barbara from time to time... But actually coverage in pmml2tex at the character level isn't that great I was sort of hoping "someone" would sort that out automatically if I dropped in (say) xetex and the stix fonts at the back end instead:-) It does work in some real examples though (for example all the examples in chapter4 of MathML3 are typeset with this). > Or are the tests (somewhat) independent of symbol > coverage? (It certainly seems more important to test behaviour rather > than whether obscure characters are available.) there are some mechanically generated character level tests at the start that exercise complete unicode blocks which you can't pass completely without good font support (and there's a whole bunch or arabic and bidi tests that I skipped altogether when I ran the tests last year) but the remaining tests are fairly conservative in character usage, concentrating mainly on interpretation of the mathml structure. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________