User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4AA21B30.8030509@morningstar2.co.uk>                              
            <4AB09B99.10508@morningstar2.co.uk>                      
            <16EDE399-62C9-48E9-941D-9564F34EACDD@gmail.com>           
            <4AB1E293.1040607@morningstar2.co.uk> <4AB23368.9010300@elzevir.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID:  <4AB23B01.3080401@morningstar2.co.uk>
Date:         Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:34:57 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: Joseph Wright <joseph.wright@MORNINGSTAR2.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: l3keys revision
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <4AB23368.9010300@elzevir.fr>
Precedence: list
Status: R

Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard wrote:
>> Probably a good idea. I'd prefer to have something we can all agree
>> stays, then add .set:N back later if it is wanted.  Expect an update later.
> 
> On general principles, I think it's indeed better to add things later than
> remove things later :-)

That's the model I've used. For the moment, I've taken .set:N out, and
moved some of the support macros to l3prg. So .tl_set:N, etc. will
definitely stay from now on.
-- 
Joseph Wright