User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4AA21B30.8030509@morningstar2.co.uk>                      
            <4AB09B99.10508@morningstar2.co.uk>           
            <16EDE399-62C9-48E9-941D-9564F34EACDD@gmail.com>
            <4AB1E293.1040607@morningstar2.co.uk>
OpenPGP: url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x50A89B42
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID:  <4AB23368.9010300@elzevir.fr>
Date:         Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:02:32 +0200
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Manuel_P=E9gouri=E9-Gonnard?= <mpg@ELZEVIR.FR>
Subject: Re: l3keys revision
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <4AB1E293.1040607@morningstar2.co.uk>
Precedence: list
Status: R

Joseph Wright a écrit :
> Will Robertson wrote:
>> If you're unsure about .set:N, perhaps it's better to drop it for now. I
>> mean, *I* like it, but others have had mixed reactions. (You've been
>> looking at l3keys recently, Manuel? Any thoughts?)
>
Unfortunately not, I was busy preparing the beginning of courses at university,
so I did less expl3-playing than I expected. However...

> Probably a good idea. I'd prefer to have something we can all agree
> stays, then add .set:N back later if it is wanted.  Expect an update later.

On general principles, I think it's indeed better to add things later than
remove things later :-)

Manuel.