Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:25:40 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8FCPYS3004084 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:25:34 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8FCLWRF016320 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:21:32 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8F8A34f005152; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:21:25 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 315339 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:21:25 +0200 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8FCLPsJ020459 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:21:25 +0200 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8FCLKA8016144 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:21:23 +0200 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1185803fga.16 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.190.37 with SMTP id n37mr6125688fgf.39.1253017280961; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.103? (219-90-167-157.ip.adam.com.au [219.90.167.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm233502fge.8.2009.09.15.05.21.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:21:19 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) References: <5.1.0.14.0.20090425151542.032a0ce0@pop3.web.de> <20090424092120.GA7843@irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de> <5.1.0.14.0.20090421122917.02f41830@pop3.web.de> <455691F1-21A4-4C65-A025-7855791829F7@gmail.com> <20090424092120.GA7843@irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de> <5.1.0.14.0.20090425151542.032a0ce0@pop3.web.de> <5.1.0.14.0.20090426075020.02780400@pop3.web.de> <20090426102229.GA26342@irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Spam-Whitelist: Message-ID: <0C0E2BA7-B8AC-4531-B4BB-19B7F844798F@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:51:12 +0930 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Will Robertson Subject: Re: \in@ wrong? To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <20090426102229.GA26342@irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -6.599 () BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2009 12:25:40.0367 (UTC) FILETIME=[A32739F0:01CA35FF] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6096 On 26/04/2009, at 7:52 PM, Heiko Oberdiek wrote: > I think, a little more robust is, but longer is: > > % Version H: > \def\in@#1#2{% A thanks backwards though time, Heiko, for your insightful analysis and clever code. This change has now been committed to the LaTeX2e SVN repository: Furthermore, the test suite still appears to be working (which I never doubted for a second). Sorry for the delay, Will