References: <5.1.0.14.0.20090901150944.026507a0@pop3.web.de>
            <4A9CCC56.80001@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <4A7921CF.5020803@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <4A86949D.3090500@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <4A886BA8.2000209@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <0417DF73-EC19-4262-B9DF-5C870D47BFCE@gmail.com>
            <4A893816.2090807@residenset.net>
            <4A89610D.8060108@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <4A8C71CC.7000006@residenset.net>
            <4A8D0048.4070101@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <4A946AD7.4020506@residenset.net>
            <4A9C2DF7.6070002@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <E6A84A92-B935-4144-9618-6BA45293958F@gmail.com>
            <4A9CCC56.80001@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <5.1.0.14.0.20090901150944.026507a0@pop3.web.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID:  <5.1.0.14.0.20090908150936.03045ec0@pop3.web.de>
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:12:17 +0200
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?L=FCck?= <uwe.lueck@WEB.DE>
Subject: Re: l3doc, was Re: xparse
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <4A9DA71F.5050604@elzevir.fr>
Precedence: list
Status: R

At 00:58 02.09.09, Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard wrote:
>Uwe Lück a écrit :
> > That's why I made niceverb and makedoc (in tug.ctan.org/pkg/nicetext;
> > somewhat clumsy still difficult with hyperref, but it serves me to
> > maintain a book class),
>
>Yes, they were on my list of things to read/try, but not enough time yet.

You may better wait for another release with more things settled and an 
improved presentation of the user interface.

> > and I find Paul Isambert's CodeDoc very nice
> > which extracts package code while typesetting the documentation.
> >
>Well, I don't like this very much: I prefer package code to be the primary
>content and documentation to be extracted from comments. I find it much easier
>for changing the code and testing it without needing ot extract it first. 
>(Same
>problem as dtx.)

I understand and agree.

Cheers,

     Uwe.