Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:23:44 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n852Nh7C000614 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:23:44 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n852JukT009675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:19:56 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n84M16tm006140; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:19:54 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 297907 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:19:54 +0200 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n852Jspb026885 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:19:54 +0200 Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com (mail-yx0-f189.google.com [209.85.210.189]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n852Jogt009657 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:19:54 +0200 Received: by yxe27 with SMTP id 27so3162856yxe.10 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.91.28.9 with SMTP id f9mr8712542agj.89.1252117189504; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.103? (219-90-152-85.ip.adam.com.au [219.90.152.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm969653agd.74.2009.09.04.19.19.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) References: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?<20090905014028.GA14731@irwin.|=EA_@|=EA_@>?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Spam-Whitelist: Message-ID: <08ED0C0D-0923-4AA5-B8F8-5C0133934321@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:49:42 +0930 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Will Robertson Subject: Re: hyper features for docus To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?<20090905014028.GA14731@irwin.|=EA_@|=EA_@>?= Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -6.599 () BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2009 02:23:44.0109 (UTC) FILETIME=[E40E19D0:01CA2DCF] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6089 On 05/09/2009, at 11:10 AM, Heiko Oberdiek wrote: > Is there a chance, that this could happen to xpackages as well? > Then module `latex3' of latex-tds would become obsolete. Your wish is my command :) I'll see what I can do this afternoon. > BTW: > expl3.tds.zip contains a duplicate: > > 4619 06-02-09 02:16 source/latex/expl3/l3vers.dtx > 4619 06-02-09 02:16 tex/latex/expl3/l3vers.dtx > > Is there a reason for the second one? It looks misplaced among > the .sty files. It needs to be there, but I don't know if it NEEDS to be there. Some historical code in l3doc (\includeltpatch) contains \input{l3vers.dtx} in order to check the distribution date against a (nonexistent so far) patch file. Without knowing how the team has dealt with these patch files in the past, nor whether we'll use them again in the future, I've just left the code as is. But at this stage it's not being used. Cheers, Will