Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:24:51 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n817OoTM005805 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:24:50 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n817K13V007116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:20:01 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7VM1OP9032073; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:19:54 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 286093 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:19:54 +0200 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n817Js5I010053 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:19:54 +0200 Received: from ueamailgate01.uea.ac.uk (ueamailgate01.uea.ac.uk [139.222.131.184]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n817Jcdw006745 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:19:42 +0200 Received: from ueams01.uea.ac.uk (ueams01.uea.ac.uk [139.222.131.78]) by ueamailgate01.uea.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n817JcDE011311 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:19:38 +0100 Received: from [139.222.114.191] by ueams01.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MiNeS-0002AO-CY for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:19:36 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <122D1D66-1300-424C-9FBC-11C0B0CCB6C9@gmail.com> <4A9517EA.208@residenset.net> <7FF23F49-785D-444F-94E0-28498B035A60@gmail.com> <4A97D80A.4000602@residenset.net> <5AEE5632-BCE2-4ED1-8FCA-F882AC15912F@gmail.com> <4A9C297E.9030404@morningstar2.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Canit-CHI2: 0.00 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN, outgoing) X-CanItPRO-Stream: UEA:outgoing (inherits from UEA:default,base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 29419181 - 020debc80754 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 213.139.130.197 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 139.222.131.184 Message-ID: <4A9CCB16.3040008@morningstar2.co.uk> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:19:50 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Joseph Wright Subject: Re: template vs template-alt To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -6.599 () BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Sep 2009 07:24:51.0254 (UTC) FILETIME=[4B42A560:01CA2AD5] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6050 Will Robertson wrote: > Just to clarify, are you happy with the > collections/type/template/instance "hierarchy" in template? Barring some > improvements we've discussed such as editing instances and template > defaults, I think the broad concept works. Yes, all seems to make sense there. When things do get finalised, we need to have all of this laid out in the documentation nicely! > When it comes down to it, it matters less what syntax we use for > defining templates and more what the template setup allows us to do. True, but as templates will be used a lot in LaTeX3, a good interface is also important. -- Joseph Wright