User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4A7921CF.5020803@morningstar2.co.uk>                              
            <4A86949D.3090500@morningstar2.co.uk>                              
            <4A886BA8.2000209@morningstar2.co.uk>                      
            <0417DF73-EC19-4262-B9DF-5C870D47BFCE@gmail.com>                   
            <4A89058A.3060506@morningstar2.co.uk>           
            <6E237F62-5DA8-4106-B270-F2D6BFBAA0EA@gmail.com>
            <4A895D7B.6030901@morningstar2.co.uk>
OpenPGP: url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x50A89B42
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID:  <4A8A6E18.8090005@elzevir.fr>
Date:         Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:02:16 +0200
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Manuel_P=E9gouri=E9-Gonnard?= <mpg@ELZEVIR.FR>
Subject: Re: xparse
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <4A895D7B.6030901@morningstar2.co.uk>
Precedence: list
Status: R

Joseph Wright a écrit :
>> Personally, I liked xparse-alt's original method, but I'm happy to leave
>> it like this until complaints start coming in :)  (Which I'm not sure
>> will happen.)
> 
> I'm not too fussed either way: it was just easier to code the way it is
> done. How do others view this? I can soon put the auto-magic back if
> that is the consensus.

I think I'd prefer the automagic way, but it's ok for me either way.

Manuel.