Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:21:50 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7C5LkxT030054 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:21:46 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n7C5IRCC000648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:18:27 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7C4wq25017198; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:18:27 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 287021 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:18:27 +0200 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7C5IRKA022898 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:18:27 +0200 Received: from anchor-post-1.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-1.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.132]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7C5IFJH025545 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:18:18 +0200 Received: from cremornelane.demon.co.uk ([80.177.25.195] helo=[192.168.0.2]) by anchor-post-1.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1Mb6E2-0004Lw-hL for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 05:18:14 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4A7921CF.5020803@morningstar2.co.uk> <4A7A1505.4040604@residenset.net> <4A7AD930.2090106@residenset.net> <8516B615-51AA-4D90-BB7D-A9E122AA0335@gmail.com> <4A804317.6050909@morningstar2.co.uk> <4A80469B.5040305@morningstar2.co.uk> <4A804ED7.4040305@morningstar2.co.uk> <4A812A23.2000808@morningstar2.co.uk> <30090124-F668-4FB3-8F03-5CB615F80D6F@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4A825097.2090700@morningstar2.co.uk> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:18:15 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Joseph Wright Subject: Re: Gellmu, was Re: xparse To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -6.599 () BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2009 05:21:50.0350 (UTC) FILETIME=[CBA312E0:01CA1B0C] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5901 Will Robertson wrote: > I suppose my general question is: would Gellmu make a good candidate for > a standardised LaTeX3 input syntax? My initial impressions are positive, > but I'm way out of my league. Me too :-) Actually defining input syntax is always listed as "for later", but does need to be tackled at some point. Perhaps a subject for a separate thread? -- Joseph Wright