Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:23:58 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5BBNvf6031250 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:23:57 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n5BBJpWc017522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:19:51 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5B8qIMf012985; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:19:41 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 287508 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:19:41 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5BBJfDl012958 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:19:41 +0200 Received: from mailgate5.uea.ac.uk (mailgate5.uea.ac.uk [139.222.130.185]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n5BBJPYI017104 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:19:29 +0200 Received: from [139.222.131.131] (helo=ueams02.uea.ac.uk) by mailgate5.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MEiJZ-0004IU-K2 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:19:25 +0100 Received: from [139.222.114.191] by ueams02.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MEiJX-0002sb-EF for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:19:23 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4A2F5FE3.3030205@morningstar2.co.uk> <4A300B9E.4000608@morningstar2.co.uk> <8C8871A5-B9AF-4EF4-8AAA-F282C1D206A0@gmail.com> <4A30C022.8000201@morningstar2.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4A30E83D.3070902@morningstar2.co.uk> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:19:25 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Joseph Wright Subject: Re: Key-value input To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -6.599 () BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2009 11:23:58.0269 (UTC) FILETIME=[1CDFE6D0:01C9EA87] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5794 Will Robertson wrote: >> (Not sure normalising things is a >> great idea: as you say, one is correct and the rest are wrong!) > > Or all are correct and none are wrong :) > But I'm not going to push the idea; it was just a stray thought some > time back. I probably prefer hyphens but I'm not willing to settle on > one or the other at this stage. I see your point. The problem comes if you want to differentiate something by case or whatever, though. I'm "minded" to leave case, at least, alone (removing spaces and hyphens would be pretty easy). >> On inheritance, I know that the pgf team have looked at things, but I'm >> not happy that they've got an understandable system. Could you give an >> example of how tempate does this: I must have missed it in the docs. >> Then I can think about it! > > Perhaps I used the wrong word. I guess I'm thinking of the \UseInstance > type of thing in template. Which is more referring to one template from > within another. Okay, I'll see how this actually works: not sure if it is dependent on the key implementation. > I'd say that if we don't need it in expl3 then we don't need it in > template. Expect keys3 changes on this! -- Joseph Wright