Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:27:54 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3O9RsCQ028428 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:27:54 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n3O9PY0u022516 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:25:34 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3NM2nTT000954; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:25:33 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 273029 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:25:33 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3O9PX6j020039 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:25:33 +0200 Received: from mail-fx0-f177.google.com (mail-fx0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n3O9PT0j022385 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:25:32 +0200 Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so991586fxm.10 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:25:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.59.18 with SMTP id h18mr761325fga.71.1240565129175; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:25:29 -0700 (PDT) References: <5.1.0.14.0.20090421122917.02f41830@pop3.web.de> <455691F1-21A4-4C65-A025-7855791829F7@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Whitelist: Message-ID: <859ec5630904240225y59c93b2bna5d31be056487634@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:25:29 +0200 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Morten_H=F8gholm?= Subject: Re: \in@ wrong? To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <455691F1-21A4-4C65-A025-7855791829F7@gmail.com> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -6.599 () BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2009 09:27:54.0164 (UTC) FILETIME=[F21DCF40:01C9C4BE] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5762 On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Will Robertson wrote: > The tendency seems to be not to change the internals of LaTeX2e, but I'd be > happy to replace the current implementation of \in@ with a more correct > version. What do others think? If others are amenable to the change, would > you be willing to write the new version? Unless I am completely mistaken, writing a new version is a simple task: just make the second argument start with something that should not appear in input, such as a the nil marker. -- Morten