User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.41de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20090421122917.02f41830@pop3.web.de>
            <455691F1-21A4-4C65-A025-7855791829F7@gmail.com>
Message-ID:  <1ed2z4fuvxk3g.dlg@nililand.de>
Date:         Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:45:50 +0200
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: Ulrike Fischer <news3@NILILAND.DE>
Subject: Re: \in@ wrong?
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <455691F1-21A4-4C65-A025-7855791829F7@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
Status: R

Am Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:03:08 +0930 schrieb Will Robertson:


>> I wonder whether this is a bug that should go to the LaTeX Bug  
>> Database, since it only
>> -- is about an internal
>> -- contradicts what one might expect
>> -- while it is not clear to me whether this can affect LaTeX's  
>> function on the user-level
 
> This certainly seems like a bug to me, although I had to modify your  
> examples to see the error:

I find the following example quite drastic too:

\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\makeatletter
    \in@{bonbon}{bon}\ifin@ YES\else NO\fi
    \in@{bon}{bonbon}\ifin@ YES\else NO\fi

    \in@{bona}{bon}\ifin@ YES\else NO\fi
    \in@{bon}{bona}\ifin@ YES\else NO\fi

\makeatother
\end{document}


-- 
Ulrike Fischer