Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:00:05 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2OExmh5022301 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:59:58 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n2OEtpH0003776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:55:51 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2O8wjwG001396; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:55:49 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 219516 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:55:49 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2OEtmZS020232 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:55:48 +0100 Received: from mordell.elzevir.fr (mordell.elzevir.fr [92.243.3.74]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2OEtZMT031330 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:55:39 +0100 Received: from roth.elzevir.fr (thue.elzevir.fr [88.165.216.11]) by mordell.elzevir.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B661536167 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:55:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roth.elzevir.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79008BFE3 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:55:33 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <18043.1237901900@cl.cam.ac.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x50A89B42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <49C8F465.4060407@elzevir.fr> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:55:33 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Manuel_P=E9gouri=E9-Gonnard?= Subject: Re: inputenc for XeTeX and LuaTeX To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <18043.1237901900@cl.cam.ac.uk> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -4 () RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2009 15:00:05.0982 (UTC) FILETIME=[37999FE0:01C9AC91] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5745 Robin Fairbairns a écrit : > i see no problem whatever with elie working on blue-sky developments. Neither do I, maybe it wasn't clear enough form my previous messages. I would see a problem however if the package was named just 'inputenc' (at least so early) because I'm afraid it would cause confusion. So to be clear : luainputenc solves a lot of problems even if it can't solve them all atm, and I appreciate it (and the rest of Élie's work, while we're at it). Renaming it too early as just 'inputenc' addresses a problem which is not yet urgent, and can possibly cause some confusion, so it should be carefully weighted whether renaming would solve more problems that it could possibly create before taking any action. > perhaps we should have a separate list for elie's work: people who feel > the need to point out that today's code may become tomorrow's bugfest > ... simply don't have to join the list. > I don't worry about tomorrow's bugfest because I am confident that Élie will take care of it. I only worry about what's the best way to help users avoid problems, or at least, know which problems are to be expected, while switching to lualatex. Manuel.