Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:18:26 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2ODIQqS020113 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:18:26 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2ODE4ZN023629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:14:04 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2O8wjkc001396; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:14:03 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 218898 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:14:03 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2ODE3oY010958 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:14:03 +0100 Received: from mail.quinscape.de (mail.quinscape.de [212.29.44.217]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n2ODDmqr006548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:13:52 +0100 Received: (qmail-ldap/ctrl 30447 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2009 13:13:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by quinx.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Mar 2009 13:13:47 -0000 Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 02BA28F85A; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:13:47 +0100 (CET) References: <11ECEE9E-C040-44DF-9D1F-97281D9128ED@gmail.com> <49C8B459.5050201@telecom-bretagne.eu> <49C8C80B.3020504@elzevir.fr> <86eiwncer9.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <49C8D015.1070205@elzevir.fr> <49C8D320.3070400@telecom-bretagne.eu> <49C8D715.7020805@elzevir.fr> <510AF2B3-466E-4362-BCEF-E53F4D0974BF@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.1.3-2; AVE: 7.9.0.120; VDF: 7.1.2.209; host: quinscape.de) Message-ID: <863ad3cbck.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:13:47 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: inputenc for XeTeX and LuaTeX To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <510AF2B3-466E-4362-BCEF-E53F4D0974BF@gmail.com> (Will Robertson's message of "Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:40:19 +1030") Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -4 () RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2009 13:18:26.0404 (UTC) FILETIME=[03F7E240:01C9AC83] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5738 Will Robertson writes: > Hi all, > > Don't forget that for utf8 encoded documents, the luatex and xetex > inputenc packages do *not* mess around with active characters or > whatever -- they prevent the legacy inputenc from doing so in the > first place. Wouldn't that preclude auxiliary files being written in LICR? -- David Kastrup