User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <49A453A1.9040000@morningstar2.co.uk>                      
            <18853.41885.687824.539619@morse.mittelbach-online.de>           
            <6173011C-79F7-4BD1-A948-EBBCFEE06A0B@gmail.com>           
            <49A63F88.7020507@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <310BAF49-D111-49E6-82E9-DE84908F987A@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID:  <49A651D4.8020103@morningstar2.co.uk>
Date:         Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:24:52 +0000
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: Joseph Wright <joseph.wright@MORNINGSTAR2.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Missing expl3 primitives
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <310BAF49-D111-49E6-82E9-DE84908F987A@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
Status: R

Will Robertson wrote:
> Well, I'll leave it there for now but I wonder if that implies we need a
> macro that has "setup" parameters:
> 
> \tlist_rescan:nn{
>  \char_make_other:N \$
>  \int_set:Nn \endlinechar {\c_minus_one}
> }{
>  $a^1$
> }

Hello Will,

Not a bad idea: fits in with the whole expl3 concept as it removes some
of the detail (which most people don't care about).

Joseph