Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:57:55 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n14Bx8ZQ023898 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:59:08 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n14BqBr6025393 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:52:11 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n148WUnv015483; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:52:05 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 183768 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:52:04 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n14Bq4bD006782 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:52:04 +0100 Received: from srv2.thewebhostserver.com (srv2.thewebhostserver.com [91.204.209.1]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n14BpkIf025146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:51:50 +0100 Received: from [87.220.156.15] (helo=PC1) by srv2.thewebhostserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LUgIF-0007iL-Lx for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:51:50 +0000 References: <4988B95B.40202@telecom-bretagne.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - srv2.thewebhostserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - listserv.uni-heidelberg.de X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tex-tipografia.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:51:45 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Javier Bezos Subject: Re: LaTeX + LuaTeX To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -3.999 () RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2009 11:57:55.0996 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0FE1DC0:01C986BF] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5646 Elie, > I would like to adapt LaTeX for LuaTeX, and I'm looking for some people > to help me. If you want to help please subscribe to luatex@tug.org > (http://lists.tug.org/luatex), the discussions will take place there. I > already started a discussion on it: > http://tug.org/pipermail/luatex/2009-February/000103.html. Just joined (I didn't until now). In fact, inputenc and fontenc pose two quite unrelated challenges - the former is necessary for LuaLaTeX to work with encodings other than utf-8, while the latter is more about taking advantage of the new features, but note the LICR mechanism used in LaTeX works in LuaTeX, provided the issue with font encondings is solved (and my little lua-inputenc does that, mainly for testing purposes, but which makes LuaLaTeX useable with old documents - I even could make my experimental Mem package to work with it, to my surprise!). And as Arthur said: > fontenc would surely be a much bigger issue. Indeed, it is. I've paused my work on a new font mechanism, but my conclusions after the tentative lua code I wrote is this task is far from trivial. Javier ----------------------------- http://www.tex-tipografia.com