Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:48:57 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mB82mtNU031261 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:48:56 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mB82jDco005739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:45:14 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mB7N2COo022853; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:45:03 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 167489 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:45:03 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mB82j3U5009617 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:45:03 +0100 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.245]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mB82j5Tq028809 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:45:09 +0100 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so1033669rvf.10 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:44:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.201.1 with SMTP id d1mr1390605rvq.293.1228704297788; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:44:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.102? (219-90-163-87.ip.adam.com.au [219.90.163.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k37sm5990393rvb.1.2008.12.07.18.44.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:44:57 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) References: <18745.42929.572931.522217@morse.mittelbach-online.de> <4939B59D.2070301@morningstar2.co.uk> <18748.5571.757922.288637@morse.mittelbach-online.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Spam-Whitelist: Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:14:54 +1030 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Will Robertson Subject: Re: New functions for l3expan; was: Recent talk on LaTeX3 To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <18748.5571.757922.288637@morse.mittelbach-online.de> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -2.599 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2008 02:48:58.0006 (UTC) FILETIME=[84763360:01C958DF] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5523 Hi Frank, I agree that various forms of \exp_after might end up not being useful all that often. On 08/12/2008, at 4:58 AM, Frank Mittelbach wrote: > we may want to have something like the above eventually (then again > perhaps > not) but i think we should first understand how we want to > rationalize the > as whatever we do or not do there has an influence on how > this > here should look like Sounds like a plan... Will