MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <491924C4.3020702@morningstar2.co.uk>
            <B6461DD9-6DDB-4AE8-9F9B-BA8D16C48A5E@gmail.com>
Message-ID:  <18713.15630.241986.200940@morse.mittelbach-online.de>
Date:         Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:06:38 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: Frank Mittelbach <frank.mittelbach@LATEX-PROJECT.ORG>
Subject: Re: \tlp_reverse:N?
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <B6461DD9-6DDB-4AE8-9F9B-BA8D16C48A5E@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
Status: R

Will Robertson writes:
 > On 11/11/2008, at 4:53 PM, Joseph Wright wrote:
 > 
 > > I see that \tlist_reverse:n has no \tlp... version.  Is this  
 > > deliberate:
 > > one might be handy!
 > 
 > Seems like a good function to have, to me.
 > I'll add it to the list :)
 > 
 > On first blush, it doesn't seem quite as "easy" as \tlist_reverse:n.  
 > Any suggestions?

depends on how efficient you want to make it ...


\def_new:Npn \tlp_reverse:N #1 {
  \tlp_set:Nx #1
    {\tlist_reverse:o{#1}}
}

\def_new:Npn \tlist_reverse:o { \exp_args:No \tlist_reverse:n }

cheers
frank