Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:08:24 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9V37xVN019923 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:08:00 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9V34YEt013056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:04:34 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9UN1gVk012111; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:04:22 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 78905 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:04:19 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9V34JFu011587 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:04:19 +0100 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.249]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9V34E0B028273 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:04:18 +0100 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so989323rvf.10 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.128.19 with SMTP id f19mr6310356rvn.107.1225422253876; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?129.127.15.244? ([129.127.15.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l31sm6293543rvb.2.2008.10.30.20.04.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) References: <48FC367F.4010509@morningstar2.co.uk> <2F66DF40-E3DA-4831-AF83-19D4B4E2949A@gmail.com> <48FC7667.40004@morningstar2.co.uk> <18684.44761.952538.461788@morse.mittelbach-online.de> <859ec5630810240143g6c1daedesd4e44f888fb474c3@mail.gmail.com> <4905AF4F.5020308@residenset.net> <859ec5630810300234o1ed410f1i3cd7bd59fc1ef791@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Spam-Whitelist: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de id m9V34JFu011621 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:34:12 +1030 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Will Robertson Subject: Re: :nFT tests To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <859ec5630810300234o1ed410f1i3cd7bd59fc1ef791@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -2.599 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Oct 2008 03:08:27.0162 (UTC) FILETIME=[F1A2BFA0:01C93B05] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5412 On 30/10/2008, at 8:04 PM, Morten Høgholm wrote: > True, it gets the job done. As you indicate, stylistically it does not > look particularly nice. I am not claiming the FT variant is perfect > but at least it is quite clear what it does and clarity of the code is > important. Yes, I agree. > However, I guess it is not particular important to avoid > reading the arguments twice so we could just drop this FT variant > completely. I dunno, any more. Could even have a command that expands to #1\use_arg_ii:nn\use_arg_i:nn or whatever to reverse a regular TF conditional. I guess we should continue to mull over things but leave it as is for now... W