Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
	 Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:25:16 +0200
Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9PCP9vD012742
	for <rainer.schoepf@PROTEOSYS.COM>; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:25:10 +0200
Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94])
	by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9PCJgim004136
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:19:42 +0200
Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9OM16YO013429;
	Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:19:35 +0200
Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with
          spool id 46964 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Sat, 25 Oct
          2008 14:19:34 +0200
Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
          by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
          m9OM16YI013429 for <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>; Sat, 25 Oct
          2008 14:19:34 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
                      listserv.uni-heidelberg.de id m9PCJYDa004269
Message-ID:  <LISTSERV%200810251419347797.01F2@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Date:         Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:19:34 +0200
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: Joseph Wright <joseph.wright@MORNINGSTAR2.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: :nFT tests
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Precedence: list
List-Help: <http://listserv.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=LATEX-L>,
           <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE?body=INFO%20LATEX-L>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:LATEX-L-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:LATEX-L-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
List-Owner: <mailto:LATEX-L-request@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
List-Archive: <http://listserv.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=LATEX-L>
X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -2.599 () BAYES_00
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 213.139.130.197
Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2008 12:25:16.0828 (UTC) FILETIME=[BCDEB5C0:01C9369C]
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 5407

On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:43:05 +0200, Morten Høgholm
<morten.hoegholm@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

>The FT variant was never meant to be heavily used - just a shuffle
>variant so to speak.

Given that, does the general test-creating macro need to include this
variant?  If it really only a very small number of cases, would it be better
to create the appropriate macros on an as-used basis (and include them in
the documentation)?
--
Joseph Wright