Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:21:00 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9KCKoCQ029913 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:20:51 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9KCFr7I027913 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:15:53 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9JM2BAF025410; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:15:49 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 57772 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:15:49 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9KCFnXe024572 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:15:49 +0200 Received: from mailgate5.uea.ac.uk (mailgate5.uea.ac.uk [139.222.130.185]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9KCFXNG025983 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:15:39 +0200 Received: from [139.222.128.187] (helo=ueams04.uea.ac.uk) by mailgate5.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KrtfZ-0006zE-Jh for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:15:33 +0100 Received: from [139.222.202.31] by ueams04.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KrtfZ-0001oX-J4 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:15:33 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48FC367F.4010509@morningstar2.co.uk> <2F66DF40-E3DA-4831-AF83-19D4B4E2949A@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <48FC7667.40004@morningstar2.co.uk> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:15:35 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Joseph Wright Subject: Re: :nFT tests To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <2F66DF40-E3DA-4831-AF83-19D4B4E2949A@gmail.com> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -2.599 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Oct 2008 12:21:00.0832 (UTC) FILETIME=[50381200:01C932AE] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5404 Will Robertson wrote: > I noticed that recently too. I think it would be better to remove that > variant in the expl3 syntax, since it doesn't seem like it adds much of > importance but it adds a bit of obfuscation. As you probably guessed from the question, that would be my preferred solution too. -- Joseph Wright