Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:09:50 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8I89imp015311 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:09:45 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m8I81gRr022525 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:01:42 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m8HM1hsp005980; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:01:41 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 43400 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:01:41 +0200 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m8I81fvo012672 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:01:41 +0200 Received: from mailgate5.uea.ac.uk (mailgate5.uea.ac.uk [139.222.130.185]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8I81P7E031894 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:01:29 +0200 Received: from [139.222.128.187] (helo=ueams04.uea.ac.uk) by mailgate5.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KgES6-0007kE-Bx for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:01:26 +0100 Received: from [139.222.200.93] by ueams04.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KgES6-0006WL-Aw for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:01:26 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48D0AF89.2010704@morningstar2.co.uk> <27990a880809170102x3a452c6elc237b94cf964687b@mail.gmail.com> <48D0FF21.8080101@morningstar2.co.uk> <48D12C65.2070908@morningstar2.co.uk> <27990a880809172307je4e62e0p2f6a9fe097ac360e@mail.gmail.com> <48D202BE.6010908@morningstar2.co.uk> <27990a880809180049p32a9f9c9x52612fa9a3b4d3a7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <48D20AD7.3090909@morningstar2.co.uk> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:01:27 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Joseph Wright Subject: Re: Array and amstext To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <27990a880809180049p32a9f9c9x52612fa9a3b4d3a7@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -2.599 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Sep 2008 08:09:50.0367 (UTC) FILETIME=[EC4D9AF0:01C91965] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5347 Will Robertson wrote: > > True. Perhaps a better idea, for those interested in absolute > backwards compatibility, is a (standard) method to keep the old > package versions lying around with standardised filenames (say, > siunitx-20080823.sty) that can be loaded when necessary. > > Lance Carnes wrote about this sort of thing in an editorial in the > most recent PracTeX Journal. So I guess there must be *some* need for > it... At least for the kernel and associated tools, everything is in a version control system. So it is not really that hard to get hold of a given version if one needs to. The problem of versions mainly applies to other packages, and that is very much down to the package authors (as was discussed at length on c.t.t recently). -- Joseph Wright