Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 14:08:35 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m88C8TCl021015 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 14:08:29 +0200 Received: from comedy.dante.de (localhost. [127.0.0.1]) by comedy.dante.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m88C85kk012607; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 14:08:05 +0200 Received: from pluto.open.ac.uk (pluto.open.ac.uk [137.108.145.32]) by comedy.dante.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m88C81DV012559 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 14:08:02 +0200 Received: from fell.open.ac.uk ([137.108.10.119]) by pluto.open.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KcfY3-0006iy-81 for latex-team@latex-project.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:08:51 +0100 Received: (from car2@localhost) by fell.open.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) id MAA08632; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 12:28:27 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: fell.open.ac.uk: car2 set sender to car2@fell.open.ac.uk using -f From: Chris Rowley MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <18629.3162.858986.567984@fell.open.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 12:28:26 +0100 To: latex-team Subject: Re: \cs:c In-Reply-To: <314F3461-90F6-4EC0-980A-85319122D382@gmail.com> References: <48C4D4F5.3060503@morningstar2.co.uk> <859ec5630809080413t37278f82wb0dfcb4468374183@mail.gmail.com> <41780601-0613-4AD5-8D2D-9696EAECD494@gmail.com> <314F3461-90F6-4EC0-980A-85319122D382@gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.76 under Emacs 20.7.1 X-DANTE-Spam-Score: -2.599 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 213.139.130.197 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 80.237.159.15 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 80.237.159.15 X-BeenThere: latex-team@latex-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: latex-team-bounces@latex-project.org Errors-To: latex-team-bounces@latex-project.org X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -102.599 () BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST Return-Path: latex-team-bounces@latex-project.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2008 12:08:35.0774 (UTC) FILETIME=[9EC7BDE0:01C911AB] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5233 Will > Looking closer, I see: > > \def_new:Npn \use:c #1{\cs:w #1\cs_end:} > \def_new:Npn \cs_use:c #1 { \cs:w#1\cs_end: } > > These two functions are used in approximately equal number throughout > expl3 and the xpackages. > > Can I deprecate one of these (i.e., do a search'n'replace across the > board) to fix this inconsistency? Sound more like 'kill one of these':-)! > I guess if I had to choose one, > \cs_use:c would be my pick. Not checked but I guees that fits with other uses of \cs... and \...use ?? chris _______________________________________________ Latex-team mailing list Latex-team@latex-project.org https://lists.dante.de/mailman/listinfo/latex-team