Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:20:05 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m88BK0Db015034 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:20:01 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m88BEFDr022828 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:14:16 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m87M1Dms004931; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:14:00 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 20788 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:13:59 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m88BDxPa030536 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:13:59 +0200 Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.178]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m88BDihF006686 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:13:49 +0200 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c21so1079293ika.2 for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.72.14 with SMTP id u14mr10643899eba.161.1220872424159; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.74.19 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:13:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48C4D4F5.3060503@morningstar2.co.uk> Message-ID: <859ec5630809080413t37278f82wb0dfcb4468374183@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:13:44 +0200 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Morten_H=F8gholm?= Subject: Re: \cs:c To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <48C4D4F5.3060503@morningstar2.co.uk> Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -2.599 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2008 11:20:05.0789 (UTC) FILETIME=[D84B44D0:01C911A4] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5230 On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Joseph Wright wrote: > Another quesition, I'm afraid. In the main, I get the impression :w > macros should be avoided if there is an equivalent :c or :n one. > However, although there is \chk_exist_cs:c, the is no mention of \cs:c > (= \@nameuse). I'd have thought this would be a good idea, or is there > a reason for avoiding this? There is \cs_use:c (in l3basics I believe). -- Morten