Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:38:03 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m887bw9r030415 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:37:59 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m887WUAh029123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:32:31 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m87M1DUY004931; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:32:21 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 19564 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:32:20 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m887WKWu010260 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:32:20 +0200 Received: from mailgate5.uea.ac.uk (mailgate5.uea.ac.uk [139.222.130.185]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m887W22Y030253 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:32:05 +0200 Received: from [139.222.128.187] (helo=ueams04.uea.ac.uk) by mailgate5.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KcbEA-0007Uq-Be for latex-l@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:32:02 +0100 Received: from [139.222.202.58] by ueams04.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KcbEA-0000Zp-Ax for latex-l@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:32:02 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <48C4D4F5.3060503@morningstar2.co.uk> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:32:05 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Joseph Wright Subject: \cs:c To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -2.599 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2008 07:38:03.0792 (UTC) FILETIME=[D3C3D900:01C91185] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5229 Another quesition, I'm afraid. In the main, I get the impression :w macros should be avoided if there is an equivalent :c or :n one. However, although there is \chk_exist_cs:c, the is no mention of \cs:c (= \@nameuse). I'd have thought this would be a good idea, or is there a reason for avoiding this? -- Joseph Wright