References:  <85BC623C-4952-4585-BC7E-4B3F75CA5A10@gmail.com>
Message-ID:  <200805151116.m4FBGwcX030377@edinburgh.nag.co.uk>
Date:         Thu, 15 May 2008 12:16:58 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: David Carlisle <davidc@NAG.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Replacing inputenc for XeTeX/LuaTeX
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <85BC623C-4952-4585-BC7E-4B3F75CA5A10@gmail.com> (message from
              Will Robertson on Thu, 15 May 2008 20:10:13 +0930)
Precedence: list
Status: R

> Any comments?

Personally I think something like that sounds like a good idea, it
should probably make a warning (at least to the log, probably console as
well) presumably most of the time it would "just work" but if the
"active character" implementation of the encoding is mapping that slot
to an arbitrarily complicated TeX construct, then presumably just
letting the character go through xetex as a native unicode character
may do something different, and it may be better to flag that
possibility in the log file.

David


________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________